Punkawallah
Über Member
Yeah, ish. Assuming the study is on the different activity patterns in Roe deer before and after a wolf attack, it might be better to actually say that.
How do you determine altered temporal activity before the wolf encounter? I presume they mean altered temporal activity, only after the encounter?
Or nowadays, not starting a sentence with "Like..." as in "Like, I went to the shop, etc." as most kids seem to.
I was going to say "following encountering wolves", but this is much better:I would have said "following the presence of wolves", but the "Do" is fine imo
"An overview and comparison of temporal activity patterns in roe deer pre and post wolf interaction."
Do you really think it matters ?
Many thanks for the suggestions. I've sent a lot of them on to the person writing the paper. Unfortunately, as I'm not the one involved I can't answer any of the questions, because even if I asked for details I probably wouldn't understand the answers.
It matters to the author of the paper. I imagine that they are aware they could make linguistic mistakes as they aren't native speakers.
If I ever hear what the answer is, I'll let you know...
I wonder if "wolf presence" is a direct translation of a German compound noun? It's certainly a bit clunky and have suggested above, rejigging the whole title can make for more natural English.
I wouldn't worry too much about the title being a closed question. It's up to the body of the paper to attempt to answer it but it's not bound succeed. The answer could well be "Maybe, but only on Wednesdays when it has been raining". Or it could be inconclusive. I mean, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Yes or no?
You can phrase the title of a paper as a question. If you're feeling mischievous.
View attachment 732519