vickster
Legendary Member
Really? A 50mph e-scooter costs about £3000.
Even an illegal home modified one?
Really? A 50mph e-scooter costs about £3000.
Really? A 50mph e-scooter costs about £3000.
Similarly not all weed users become Heroin addicts. That doesn't mean that weed is not considered a gateway drug.
The max escooter you can buy without a license and paperwork is 50cc. They are limited to 30mph. You might be able to squeeze an extra 10mph out of them if you deregulate them, although the range will then reduce.Even an illegal home modified one?
Not everyone owns a Ferrari and drives like an idiot. You can't legislate based on outliers.Not all drinkers become alcoholics but it doesn't mean its safe to consume.
Ironic that on this thread about escooters....the Google ad banner is for escooters (also a certain ex-commodities trader from the metals exchange whom I loathe). Blasted AI algorithms
I've never seen an advertisement on the site.
Nor me
Should I be disabling the adblocker to support the site???
never even occurred to me that there should be ads on it - but I suppose someone has to pay for stuff
She lost her case last week. The picture of the pothole she was using, couldn't be proven to be the one that caused her to part company with the e-scooter.That happened recently. Reported in December https://www.standard.co.uk/video/ne...thole-crash-which-broke-her-leg-b1044253.html
A woman is suing Barnet council for failing to maintain a road after she hit a pothole while illegally riding her e-scooter.Giovanna Drago is asking for £30,000 in the October incident which broke her knee.Barnet council say she should get nothing as her actions were illegal with only “authorised hire scheme” scooters allowed on public highways.Her case is the first such to go to court and could set a precedent for future claims.
I don't know what the outcome was (if any, yet)
It's a bit weird anyway. If I recall correctly from my days working as a legal secretary we always focused on liability before damages. The figure is likely a preliminary one at best, to try to settle before Court. Obviously in this case there is no court, as liability has not been proven.She lost her case last week. The picture of the pothole she was using, couldn't be proven to be the one that caused her to part company with the e-scooter.
https://www.driving.co.uk/news/ille...ury-claim-in-first-uk-court-case-of-its-type/
Tell Judge Jan Luba KC, who presided over the case at Central London county court that there was no court involved.It's a bit weird anyway. If I recall correctly from my days working as a legal secretary we always focused on liability before damages. The figure is likely a preliminary one at best, to try to settle before Court. Obviously in this case there is no court, as liability has not been proven.
She lost her case last week. The picture of the pothole she was using, couldn't be proven to be the one that caused her to part company with the e-scooter.
https://www.driving.co.uk/news/ille...ury-claim-in-first-uk-court-case-of-its-type/
Tell Judge Jan Luba KC, who presided over the case at Central London county court that there was no court involved.