Please don’t think I was having a pop at you @I like Skol and I’ll confess I just gave it a quick read through before heading out for a (perfectly agreeable) ride. My grizzle was aimed more at some of the more unpleasant prejudices rearing their heads upthread with zero actual evidence.A useful report, but annoyingly from a skim through appears to be missing the stats that actually matter.
View attachment 417821
This chart shows a steady decrease in deaths and incidents since the early 1980s until around 10yrs ago when slight & serious incidents began to rise. This may not be a relevant increase as the amount on cycling (traffic) appears to rise too, although this line does hint at a worrying trend....
View attachment 417822
So from this data what can we conclude? Unless I am mistaken, the death/incident data is taken from a change in the 'actual' occurrence figures rather than the rate of events? This makes the data difficult to evaluate as it appears to be set against a varying level of 'traffic' whether this be miles ridden or hours spent riding?
A more useful figure, and one that may be more indicative of an individuals actual risk, would be the deaths/incidents per mile or hour. This is used here, but only for a single defined period rather than year on year....
View attachment 417826
Fortunately, the data I want does appear to be included in the report and when I have some spare time later I am going to mess around graphing it in a way that might help reveal if things are getting better/worse for an individual cyclist.
Ive had two collisions in ten years, with the one last year by far the more serious. But on the whole I feel as though the driving, locally at least, is improving around cyclists. That’s my own perception and I could understand how different regions, experiences, riding habits and biases could change that perception.