Of course you can look at statistics like that as you so cleverly point out but they don't tell you about why they are being committed and what are the causes.Here are some statistics to be going on with. Yes, you can argue about measurement protocols, underreporting or data sources, but this is about as close as you'll get to a robust survey and is certainly a step up from "it's forners an druggies, innit".
https://assets.publishing.service.g...ta/file/686969/pedal-cycle-factsheet-2017.pdf
Thought that amber meant stop.That's been the situation in King's Lynn pretty much forever. Lots of traffic lights here (used to be 13 sets in the 2 miles before my old home) and few traffic police, so it would be surprising if I ever drove through on just-amber and didn't have at least two cars follow me. As I mentioned elsewhere, the last year or so, I've seen some motorists treating red lights as a sort of give-way where they merely slow right down, creep across the stop line (usually blocking any pelican/toucan/puffin crossing), check if another motorist can hit them before they clear the junction and then boot the accelerator if not. RLJ and yellow box cameras would be very profitable but we don't have any AFAIK.
For now, when cycling through traffic lights, please check that either all conflicting lanes are blocked by vehicles or that nothing's approaching fast enough to hit you before you ride out, even on green. It probably annoys following drivers but the ones who queue behind you seem less likely to hit you than RLJers.
Copy and pasted from HCThought that amber meant stop.
The "Amber Gambler" returns.These days you have to wait at green for a few seconds for the red light runners to clear the junctions. Amber is seen by many as the 'floor it' signal.
And we have a winner!Of course you can look at statistics like that as you so cleverly point out but they don't tell you about why they are being committed and what are the causes.
The OP asks 'what is going on' and your survey doesn't tell us that, only the figures.
Please tell me I am just experiencing a hiccup and in reality things are no worse than they were 10-15 yrs ago.......
is therefore the likely explanation, so coming up with explanations for why something is getting worse when best evidence says it's not actually getting worse seems a bit futile.Please tell me I am just experiencing a hiccup
A useful report, but annoyingly from a skim through appears to be missing the stats that actually matter.Here are some statistics to be going on with. Yes, you can argue about measurement protocols, underreporting or data sources, but this is about as close as you'll get to a robust survey and is certainly a step up from "it's forners an druggies, innit".
https://assets.publishing.service.g...ta/file/686969/pedal-cycle-factsheet-2017.pdf
Have you got any better sources?Oh dear, have we really resorted to quoting the DoT as a credible source now?