Thats not entirely accurate, Mr Rider.
It is accurate.
The original stories, as best as I can recall, said BP had closed three or a 'small number' of petrol stations which had run out of fuel due to lack of deliveries.
That information was passed on to the public, which in turn led to panic buying.
Should the media have censored the original story?
I've already pointed out the insurmountable practicalities of that, and I can't support the notion that such a story should be censored.
Shooting the messenger is superficially attractive, but the idea fails badly under even the most cursory examination.
Unless someone can tell me how the original story should have been reported, or what sanction could reasonably be applied retrospectively.
Fining or otherwise punishing the media for reporting a simple event - some petrol stations closed - just makes no sense from any perspective.