Reads like a report on cycling from 20 years ago.
So they took the tit off?and one final point although a tad pertantic Titov didn't even make it to 60 minutes before being subbed.....
That's the one. Thank you very much.
So they took the tit off?
<boom tish>
... and sent back to bed !You don't deserve a like for that, just a groan. Groan.
Too late, you already liked it... and sent back to bed !
I don't think we did. I heard it on the radio today. On the BBC. So I reckoned it might have been a few months old.Did we already mention the IOC retesting London 2012 samples and 31 athletes facing a ban from the Beijing games?
Did we already mention the IOC retesting London 2012 samples and 31 athletes facing a ban from the Beijing games?
31 without the results from 254 tests on samples taken at 2012 London
Disappointing that the media are focussed so much on Russia, when Jamaica smells almost as bad. But I really like the whole idea of retrospective testing. If you've cheated it must remove some of the glory, never being sure you've got away with it.
On another matter, watching some baseball last night, the commentators were talking about Marlon Byrd. Second offence and he only gets a one year ban. US sports still giving you three chances to find a doping programme that can't be detected.
No doubt. It's an odd trajectory though. 6 month ban > year ban > life. There's very little disincentive to try it in the first (and second) instance.Re American sports, I guess the collective bargaining agreements that underpin all of the major leagues will have fought for the three strikes ruling