Doping in other sports

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

oldroadman

Veteran
Location
Ubique
Should be 4 years, no argument. If an anti-doping agency ran the whole process from test to sanction, no argument. But ITF are running the hearing and sanction, and they need to "protect" the image of a big money sport that is quite possibly riddled with chemical problems. Interesting comment the other day "look back at Borg, Conners, etc., they look like little old men compared to the giants of today, who hit the ball incredibly hard and can do so for hours on end". I rest my case. ITF will listen to all the PR BS, good looking woman and all that, has increased the sport's profile, and I'll be surprised if she does not get off with much more than a 6 month holiday. Absolute hypocrisy.
 
Location
Alberta
Andy Murray is generally outspoken on doping in Tennis, and doesn't seem particularly tolerant of it in the press, God knows what he says in private. It would be interesting to hear what he would say about this
"I find it strange that there's a prescription drug used for heart conditions and so many athletes competing at the top level of their sport would have that condition. That sounds a bit off to me."
 

SWSteve

Guru
Location
Bristol...ish
Wad a are considering repealing those banned from Melondium it would appear.

I would understand this, provided those who had been using it lived in the countries in which it is available, but then again, I'm not a super fancy tennis babe who loves in America, who might feel victimised and need the
Worlds press to support her.
 
Wad a are considering repealing those banned from Melondium it would appear.

I would understand this, provided those who had been using it lived in the countries in which it is available, but then again, I'm not a super fancy tennis babe who loves in America, who might feel victimised and need the
Worlds press to support her.
I read something earlier today re this (which I now cannot find), and there was some element of timescales involved re how long it remains within the body and the levels present. So the guidelines permit some athletes within a given time period who had certain levels to be "let off", whilst others remain banned.

I'll go see if I can find the article again...
 

SWSteve

Guru
Location
Bristol...ish
I read something earlier today re this (which I now cannot find), and there was some element of timescales involved re how long it remains within the body and the levels present. So the guidelines permit some athletes within a given time period who had certain levels to be "let off", whilst others remain banned.

I'll go see if I can find the article again...


I heard something similar. The half-life of Melondium is relatively unknown, but I don't understand why those who live in countries where Melondium isn't available would be able to take it without repercussions. WADA should take that into account, but there can't be any grey areas...
 
U

User169

Guest
In the case of Sharapova (IIRC) her defence was never that she had stopped taking it when it became banned, it was that she did not read her emails - ergo by implication she has confessed to taking it when it was banned.

Bet she's regretting that now!
 

SWSteve

Guru
Location
Bristol...ish
I suspect that with WADA having dug themselves a small hole wrt the length of time the stuff remains in the body that she will be included in an all encompassing 2016 amnesty


Which would be complete BS, it should be managed by countries in which the drug was available (which is still a ridiculous waiver). But that would lead to a big case with CAS
 
Top Bottom