You may well be right and it did cross my mind. Has anyone been given the full four yet for a first offence?Isn't it 4 now and only two if there's no fault and forgetting to check the banned list doesn't count?
You may well be right and it did cross my mind. Has anyone been given the full four yet for a first offence?Isn't it 4 now and only two if there's no fault and forgetting to check the banned list doesn't count?
Yes, they are handing out four year bansYou may well be right and it did cross my mind. Has anyone been given the full four yet for a first offence?
"I find it strange that there's a prescription drug used for heart conditions and so many athletes competing at the top level of their sport would have that condition. That sounds a bit off to me."Andy Murray is generally outspoken on doping in Tennis, and doesn't seem particularly tolerant of it in the press, God knows what he says in private. It would be interesting to hear what he would say about this
Some attention being turned by journalists to other mainstream sports, although cycling still gets a mention.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/35952566
I read something earlier today re this (which I now cannot find), and there was some element of timescales involved re how long it remains within the body and the levels present. So the guidelines permit some athletes within a given time period who had certain levels to be "let off", whilst others remain banned.Wad a are considering repealing those banned from Melondium it would appear.
I would understand this, provided those who had been using it lived in the countries in which it is available, but then again, I'm not a super fancy tennis babe who loves in America, who might feel victimised and need the
Worlds press to support her.
I read something earlier today re this (which I now cannot find), and there was some element of timescales involved re how long it remains within the body and the levels present. So the guidelines permit some athletes within a given time period who had certain levels to be "let off", whilst others remain banned.
I'll go see if I can find the article again...
In the case of Sharapova (IIRC) her defence was never that she had stopped taking it when it became banned, it was that she did not read her emails - ergo by implication she has confessed to taking it when it was banned.The half-life of Melondium is relatively unknown
In the case of Sharapova (IIRC) her defence was never that she had stopped taking it when it became banned, it was that she did not read her emails - ergo by implication she has confessed to taking it when it was banned.
Bet she's regretting that now!
I suspect that with WADA having dug themselves a small hole wrt the length of time the stuff remains in the body that she will be included in an all encompassing 2016 amnesty