Pro Tour Punditry
Guru
A summary from inrng
http://inrng.com/2016/08/armitstead-whereabouts-ukad-british-cycling/
http://inrng.com/2016/08/armitstead-whereabouts-ukad-british-cycling/
Trouble is, it's not only that, is it? She'd also need to imagine that the testers won't be so careless as to make another similarly pathetic attempt to find her and I'm not sure why she'd do that after they'd done it once... so I suspect there was a review which ruled against her.
The Daily Mail article quoted by inmg says: "Sportsmail understands the testing official did not explain to hotel staff why he wanted to know Armitstead’s room number."What should [he] have done?
Agree. I imagine it's very easy to miss a single test, which is why it takes three for any sanction. If you've had two in the year already, I can't imagine being in any other mental state than completely OCD about it.She has been very lucky to get away with it IMHO
What, like said "please could you let your guest know that I am a drug tester and she should hide any drugs/blood bag fridge/identical twin in the time it takes me to get to her room in order to get a nice big blackmail-level tip"?The Daily Mail article quoted by inmg says: "Sportsmail understands the testing official did not explain to hotel staff why he wanted to know Armitstead’s room number."
Which, if true, certainly suggests he could have done more.
Or even just a quick "Listen I am subject to dope testing and have put down that I'll be here between 6am and 7am so if anyone pops in looking for me can you let them know what room I'm in, maybe get some ID from them first just in case they are international assassins..."What, like said "please could you let your guest know that I am a drug tester and she should hide any drugs/blood bag fridge/identical twin in the time it takes me to get to her room in order to get a nice big blackmail-level tip"?
Maybe the tester should have contacted the DS or race direction (one of whom presumably booked the hotel) and got them to instruct the hotel to show them up?
I wouldn't hold not giving a reason against the tester, but it seems surprising that they don't give athletes a standard card to hand to hotel staff at check-in saying "I am a professional athlete subject to random testing. If anyone showing this sort of card [PICTURE] asks to visit me, please allow them to do so without further question." This isn't the first hotel which has refused to allow them to contact a guest.
She could have been staying in a hotel on her own, nothing to do with cycling. And her manager/agent wouldn't have been around or, indeed, been able to phone her if her phone was on silent anyway.The UKAD tester could have called the agent/manager in an effort to get contact, if they didn't have a list of these people then they are at the least not doing their job properly. They have to put in a bit of effort to locate people,
That's the bit I do not understand. Presumably this was an out of competition blood test for the passport. The athlete picks the 1 hour slot. so if you regularly want to sleep beyond 6 am then pick a slightly later one. Like many riders my lad has 7 am-8 am to avoid the issue you raise, as he is usually getting up for breakfast then, irrespective of whether he is at home or travelling. Selecting a time that causes you to become less easily contactable because you have to turn off your phone does not seem to make sense. Whilst it may not contravene the regs it is not helpful.The vampires (blood testers checking h-crit) come with their needles and centrifuges at 0600. No fun when you got to sleep at 2300 and expect a rest until at least 0900.
A more permanent link might be http://nicolecooke.com/my-views-on-lizzie-armitstead-missing-3-out-of-competition-drugs-tests/ but despite the title and a generally negative tone towards athletes missing tests, it doesn't look to me like she gives her views on Lizzie Armitstead's case in particular.Nicole Cooke is not impressed http://nicolecooke.com/news/