Doping git thread

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

oldroadman

Veteran
Location
Ubique
Sport better off without HV. Now a bitter old fellow. Best consigned to history. Honorary maybe he still is (for the moment), honourable is another matter. When all that's left is attacking a man who is being as open as he can and wants to clean things up to a point where other sports have to start looking at how things are done, then it's a sad day. In summary, your era is over Hein, just go quietly into the gentle evening of retirement, and be grateful that you covered your tracks quite well.
 

HF2300

Insanity Prawn Boy
Have to say, if that letter is a reflection of Heinous & Fat Pat's time in office, you've got to wonder how much of the pre-Cookson years was cock-up rather than conspiracy. He doesn't exactly come across as an efficient and effective manager...
 

jifdave

rubbish uphill, downhill 'balast' make me fast
Location
Rochester
So what they're saying is, we haven't actually made a decision yet but Astana are on probation. Unbelievable perhaps, but predictable.
I believe it will be announced in a few days that Aru has a dodgy bio passport and isn't 'sick' as has been reported.

Another potential Astana doping case
 

smutchin

Cat 6 Racer
Location
The Red Enclave
If that's true it's hard to see how Astana could possibly keep their licence.

Maybe it's only the legal wranglings that are saving them - Fuglsang threatening to sue the UCI etc. I suppose they'd have to be on very firm legal ground before taking away a team's licence, especially mid-season.
 

Keith Oates

Janner
Location
Penarth, Wales
I've just waded through Verbruggen's letter and it shows what an absolute 'prawn' he was and still is. The best thing is for all Cycling people and publications to agree not to mention him again in the future.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

The Couch

Über Member
Location
Crazytown
Astana keep their licence, to be kept under observation*:
I was really expecting a stronger signal to be honest. Since they took their time having this (independantly) investigated and in combination with the pretty harsh/strong comments that Cookson was giving lately towards cheating in general and Astana in particular.
(and maybe since many people here had also made the comment that the UCI was making sure to have a strong case before they would strike the hammer down)

Still... if this Aru thing is right, UCI should have enough, right?
Astana couldn't even use the "it's the nobodies and has-beens that are being caught", since Aru was their 2nd best rider last year
 
Location
Midlands
Have the UCI been having under the table chats with CAS people? - If CAS had ruled against them it would of been very embarrassing - to the point of why even bother involving the UCI in issuing licences in the first place
 
Top Bottom