Pogacer saint or sinner ?
Much as i hope hes a once in generation natural talent the more i watch the more the doubts are creeping in.
What about the third placed woman at Strade Bianche last week - still no DQ ?
https://www.cyclingweekly.com/racing/uci-examining-strade-bianche-podium-riders-use-of-blood-monitor
I missed this story. It doesn't really class as doping. Yet it's not just UCI sock length/ equipment fetishism either. More like the UCI trying to lock the stable door after the (HRM, power meter) horse has bolted.
I wonder if maybe she was never expecting such a high profile finish, so she though what the heck.
It's a bit clear cut though I would have thought - you can't use them - look at how strict they are with the banned bar grip positions.
Unless shes a diabetic i guess ?
My advice us to watch a different sport if you think anyone who's good is on the juice.
Just wait till there's some evidence before worrying about it
Quite.
I find all this oh-so clever "scepticism" for every half-succesful rider crushingly boring.
Stick to the facts, or go and join some Facebook Drugs Cheat group. There are plenty of back-slapping drugs "sceptics" out there - who all know better than me, of course - let them amuse each-other.
Well, Vingegaard beat him last year at the Tour so he must be a doper too.
And young Oscar Onley was neck and neck with Vingo at a race twice so he must be a doper too... And so on ad infinitum.
My advice us to watch a different sport if you think anyone who's good is on the juice.
Just wait till there's some evidence before worrying about it
It's a bit of a touchy/sore subject for those of us that love the sport...I was asking people's opinions, expecting reasoned replies and I get watch other sport or basically bullying .guess I will just communicate with people who can actually have a debate without resorting to mudslinging from now on
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_doping_cases_in_cycling
The facts are even more depressing than the sceptics.
Quite.
I find all this oh-so clever "scepticism" for every half-succesful rider crushingly boring.
Stick to the facts, or go and join some Facebook Drugs Cheat group. There are plenty of back-slapping drugs "sceptics" out there - who all know better than me, of course - let them amuse each-other.
I was asking people's opinions, expecting reasoned replies and I get watch other sport or basically bullying
I prefer to pick goodies and baddies for reasons that make no sense whatever, or for no reason at all, and cheer/boo accordingly. Sometimes baddies are chosen for doping related reasons (Valverde) sometimes I ignore awkward facts about my goodies (Contador). Sometimes baddies hang around so long they become elderly goodies (Valverde again). Luckily I had Armstrong down as a baddie all along so I was spared any feeling of betrayal. I'm also a bit of a one for the underdog, and have a terrible memory so a baddie who I might have taken against previously because I don't like his silly name could reappear next year as a goodie because I think his silly name is cool.