Just a complete non story. Doping is a boring subject, unless it's the stories about smuggling and how insane some of the old school dopers were.Anyone else actually losing interest in this case ? Well here's a bit more
https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/ju...e-was-anything-suspicious-about-chris-froome/
I don't know. The Julich interview seems to have some new stuff, such as accusing Freeman of botching treatment of Froome's bilharzia, that I don't remember reading before. Have you?
It's new but such an old story, I lost interest in it a while back, but my attention span isn't great. How long has it been dragging on for!
It's a bit over four years since UKAD rolled into the BC/Sky velodrome, reportedly provoked in part by Tiernan-Locke's accusation that Freeman offered him Tramadol at the 2012 Worlds. I do wonder if someone is hoping that we all lose interest in it, but the amazing ever-deepening layering of cover-ups and accusations is keeping me interested and making me think there probably is a puddle of shoot at the bottom of the well and the question is how deep it is.
We'll see. I think Freeman's going to need to find another career and some other former BC support staff will be tried too. The main question is whether any riders will be caught out in the end: I expect some of the anti-doping samples are still available and BC may have been pushing the envelope of legality so much that they may have burst it somewhere and either improved tests or knowing what to look for (maybe being told in exchange for leniency for someone) might reveal it - but I don't think we're going to see any winners caught and definitely no Armstrong-sized all-out cheating conspiracy revealed.
To be honest, I'm not sure what his point is?
