Or...As far as Freeman is concerned it's going to be hard to get a "not guilty" as far as himself goes.So try and shift some blame ?I don't see how that would be a defence. If anything, it would undermine the defence that he truly believed the patches were for Sutton.
That's what i was thinking,only slight correction Col "alleged bullying"I reckon that Freeman has to be struck off even for what he has already admitted!
Perhaps he is now just getting his own back for bullying that he suffered in the past?
As for proving what the testosterone was for... I can't see that being proved one way or the other.
Legally, yes - "alleged", but you only have to see Sutton ranting for a few seconds (or read some of his public past comments) to realise that he wouldn't be someone who you'd want to have a disagreement with!That's what i was thinking,only slight correction Col "alleged bullying"
Wonder if his wife will feel obliged to attend now though - to "clarify matters"
I allways thought what a sweetie...like a cuddly Koala.Im not as judgemental as you though.Legally, yes - "alleged", but you only have to see Sutton ranting for a few seconds (or read some of his public past comments) to realise that he wouldn't be someone who you'd want to have a disagreement with!![]()
Good luck looking for those pics !Pics, or it didn't happen.
I think their aim was to give us all a jolly good laugh. And they succeeded admirably.What are the GMC trying to prove with his testimony?