oldroadman
Veteran
- Location
- Ubique
Just have double the amount of neutral service cars. That'll solve the problem because they'll be taking out so many riders that there'll be no chance of a packed peloton.
Just have double the amount of neutral service cars. That'll solve the problem because they'll be taking out so many riders that there'll be no chance of a packed peloton.
you are joking right?? do you know how fast a disc would have to spin to cut through human flesh and bone? and if it can happen with brake discs it can also happen with the rear cassettes, if the rear wheel flie off and approx 100 teeth coming flying towards you on the cassetteWhat if a wheel comes off, bounces across the road and the disc slices the arm off a watching child? Or cuts the ear off a passing dog? What then? Is there no end to the horror?
I'm pretty sure he's deadly seriousyou are joking right??
I give up.do you know how fast a disc would have to spin to cut through human flesh and bone?
Promises, promises!I give up.
I wonder if the UCI drop their ridiculous weight limit rules would we would see such a big take up of disc brakes?
My disc brake machine is 7.6kg without me putting any effort into shedding weight, I could get it down to 6.8 - 7kg for not much ££, as Citius posted above me, many teams are already adding weight to frames!I wonder if the UCI drop their ridiculous weight limit rules would we would see such a big take up of disc brakes?
Most pro team bikes are already carrying added weight in order hit the minimum weight limit, so I doubt it would make any difference..
My thoughts were if the UCI lowered or removed the minimum weight rules then maybe teams would stick to the lighter calipers. At the moment, there is no weight penalty in discs because the teams simple require less ballast in the frame.
So if the UCI did away with a minimum weight limit - do you think teams would drops discs in order to create a superlightweight bike?