No real surprise though.Here we go again...
Santambroggio had a great rise (in the beginning of) this season - although I had expected an even better Giro from him -... I am a bit gutted that we still have to look at those things with reserve
No real surprise though.Here we go again...
Santambroggio had a great rise (in the beginning of) this season - although I had expected an even better Giro from him -... I am a bit gutted that we still have to look at those things with reserve
No real surprise though.
Montova wasn't it, I always forget that stuff, luckily Rich doesn't.Indeed. As @RichP pointed out when I brought up his name in the Giro thread, he was already under investigation.
vaughters twitterfeed said:Good to see Santambroggio positive. Us dirty ol managers have known his performances were high risk for a while. Good to see system work.
David Millars twitterfeed said:The peloton knew Vini Fantini weren't trustworthy: was the talking point for the first week of the Giro (until misery & survival took over).
This is no time to start a hi-viz argument!At least that eyesore of a kit will not longer been seen in the peloton
What beggars belief though is that a rider already flying above the radar and involved in another investigation would dope again. Is EPO as addictive as crack or is he (they) a complete farking idiot?Indeed. As @RichP pointed out when I brought up his name in the Giro thread, he was already under investigation.