and yet you can still clearly see me. funny that.
the background is considerably lighter coloured than I am in that pictureAs clear as a dark object against a dark background.
Don't drag data and science into a debate when "It's obvious" what the right answer is, anyone with any common sense can see that.2207285 said:Do you have any stats for cyclist injuries broken down by reference to what they were wearing, whether or not they were lit etc., or is this all on a "stands to reason" basis?
GC funny though it may seem to you the purple rider shows up far more than the dark one.
NonsenseThis more powerful image could make the black one almost invisible to some.
I think the young folk have a phrase... what is it... oh yes... "Whatever!"But hey if black is the only way to slim for some then I suppose they have to do it.
Riding in the dark sussex countryside I will take my chances with black, reflectives and lights as I'm sure this stands out well against a dirty muddy 6ft hedge.Living in the dark Lincolnshire countryside I will take my chances with brighter colours, not sure black stands out well against a dirty muddy 6ft hedge.
It isn't the colours which is the important bit, it is the contrast. IIRC, Red is the colour which the human eye is most sensitive to, and that is why Red means stop on traffic lights. Yellow tends to blend in under sodium street lights, and so for most people cycling at night, white and white or red reflective would work well.
So In an ideal world, for visibility purposes, you would have red for the day, and white for the night
It is of course personal choice. But if you look at yourself in the mirror before you go out for a ride and think 'I look cool' rather than 'I look visible' start asking questions!
bianchi1 - Presumably you also also wear brightly coloured trousers/leggings when out on a ride. Such things are available and these would certainly maximise your visibility, which can only be a good thing. Do you wear them? If not, why not?