Profpointy
Legendary Member
I think we're all old enough to make up our own minds.
Of course you can make up your own mind. I can't order anyone not to give money to encourage hatred and violence to cyclists ( amongst others)
I think we're all old enough to make up our own minds.
I think we're all old enough to make up our own minds.
Just don't click folks
But you already have.Of course you can make up your own mind. I can't order anyone not to give money to encourage hatred and violence to cyclists ( amongst others)
It's not an order, because he obviously knows he doesn't command anyone around here. Use of the imperative for added force is part of standard English.But you already have.
Responding to that rubbish with counter-arguments is better than sticking your head in the sand. As for clicks giving the news company money: how much money would one click give them? Personally, I think it's better to try to educate people than to pretend a problem doesn't exist.Well ok, but every time you click on a daily mail link you are quite literally giving them money and also quite literally paying for further anti cyclist propaganda which can often come close to incitement to kill cyclists (supposedly just a joke). This is quite apart from casual racism, homophobia, sexism etc even though they may slightly downplay their former support for Hitler
Just don't click folks
Responding to that rubbish with counter-arguments is better than sticking your head in the sand. As for clicks giving the news company money: how much money would one click give them? Personally, I think it's better to try to educate people than to pretend a problem doesn't exist.
Yes, you made that point with the previous post, and I understood it then. There's no need to repeat the point.How much money one click gives is obvioulsy not much, yet all the clicks entirely fund the site. They have no other income. By engaging you are funding them and specifically you are funding this kind of article.
Yes, you made that point with the previous post, and I understood it then. There's no need to repeat the point.
How much money one click gives is obvioulsy not much, yet all the clicks entirely fund the site. They have no other income. By engaging you are funding them and specifically you are funding this kind of article.
Isn't that like Sweeney Todd banning Gillette?