jefmcg
Guru
+1. Some idiots already think it's the law so it's only going to get worse.Even if they are awesome, some idiots will think it will apply to all cycle lanes.
Also, some of those idiots will be police.
+1. Some idiots already think it's the law so it's only going to get worse.Even if they are awesome, some idiots will think it will apply to all cycle lanes.
Frankly given the crap I've been through since being knocked off on CS7, I'm quite happy to ride segregated away from traffic IF conditions are met as I considered above
Let's face it, if the infra is good enough then cyclists will want to use it even without being compelled to. The only reason to make it mandatory is if it isn't good enough
Perhaps they'll also enforce it so cars stay on the road and out of ASLs, bus lanes and off of footways. Even if were introduced its be as unenforceable as every other piece of cycling legislation .
The link did seem to be mostly devoid of content.It's rubbish, it's that Nick Ferrari shock-jock bloke, he ASKED Boris if the lanes will be mandatory and ITV news got all excited and printed it as a story. It's piffle.
What's your point?Odd that half of the comments seem NOT to have read the OP. It specifies a fully segregated lane with a B_A_R_R_I_E_R between cycle lane and traffic ie no parking and no other traffic. If you want to complain about the idea then fine but at least read it.
If this rubbish ever gets past the talking stage I predict civil disobedience. I for one will ride where I like, not pay any fines and go to jail if necessary. Maybe.
I know, I did think of that but London isn't the Netherlands. The question posed is where are the drawings? Well here's one linked in another CC thread and it looks terrible.don't ride in holland then....
http://www.holland-cycling.com/tips-and-info/safety/road-signs-for-cyclists
As a wise man is fond of saying... show us the drawing...
It's very sad that even experienced cyclists will consider surrendering their right to the road in exchange for a pipe dream.