david k
Hi
- Location
- North West
i agree, there are no winners but the guy should have got longer. sounds like a cowardly act to me, punched an older man then run off
Let's face it, nobody would be saying 'there are no winners here' if a motorist had murdered a cyclist. Forget the tribalism for a second. A man punched another man, killing him. He deserves to be sent down. Justice is the winner
+1He was no cyclist. He was a thug who happened to be riding a bike.
He was no cyclist. He was a thug who happened to be riding a bike.
HE WAS MEANT TO BE ON ANTIPSYCHOTIC MEDS !!!!!!!
It is a damming indictment on the judicial system. Two of the three males who assaulted (GBH with intent) were given three years. I do not understand how somebody who takes the life of another gets 18 months!!!
HE WAS MEANT TO BE ON ANTIPSYCHOTIC MEDS !!!!!!!
One psychopathic man who wasn't managed in the community properly, two of his idiot friends who are as probably as scared of him as the driver was and probably do what ever he tells them to, who then get sucked into a joint venture that killed a man and then one unfortunate man who didn't check his mirror before he got out of a car and got killed for it.
A series of unfortunate events - it's all the result of human failings and weakness, the failure to keep the guy off the streets, the failure of his friends who were weak and easily led.