Walsh did compare an interview with Armstrong as "Frost - Nixon". I don't think he minds the attention all that much.Astonishing how he manages to convince himself that he and Walsh are similar. Walsh is a determined and able foe but I don't see the similarity. What LA seems to have done is confuse Walsh with his own mirror image. Which is why he manages to accuse Walsh of ''tweaking'' facts. Because we always take what he says as fact, don't we?
I don't. I haven't even read the interviews. I might take an interest if he co-operates with any UCI investigation.And the first broadcast interview with Lanced is on one of the BBC radio channels at 1pm today.
If you want a pack of lies you should be able to fill your boots
I don't. I haven't even read the interviews. I might take an interest if he co-operates with any UCI investigation.
I was wondering about this after reading the bit where he invites Cookson to call him yet says he'll only talk if it means a reduced ban. It's a funny strategy because he's made it almost impossible for Cookson to call him without it looking like horse trading yet the result of blocking contact is that he never gets the possibility of riding competitively again. He's holding himself hostage.I think the interviews are quite interesting, he mentions communicating with the UCI and WADA however the manner in which he does so suggests to me that he is unwilling to do so without conditions relating to his punishment.
I get the feeling he still thinks he holds some of the cards.
Announcer said on the radio this morning LA thinks he's been given a hard time, I didn't listen to any more than that.
And no media coverage whatsoever.I think his punishment should be to ride the tour seven times with no bike seat.
Oh, the irony!2762404 said:There is this gem
"I have experienced massive personal loss, massive loss of wealth while others have truly capitalised on this story."
Announcer said on the radio this morning LA thinks he's been given a hard time, I didn't listen to any more than that.