Cyclingnews talks to Armstrong - Interview part 1.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
That's all ok then. As you were...
 

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
Astonishing how he manages to convince himself that he and Walsh are similar. Walsh is a determined and able foe but I don't see the similarity. What LA seems to have done is confuse Walsh with his own mirror image. Which is why he manages to accuse Walsh of ''tweaking'' facts. Because we always take what he says as fact, don't we?
 
OP
OP
Pedrosanchezo

Pedrosanchezo

Veteran
Astonishing how he manages to convince himself that he and Walsh are similar. Walsh is a determined and able foe but I don't see the similarity. What LA seems to have done is confuse Walsh with his own mirror image. Which is why he manages to accuse Walsh of ''tweaking'' facts. Because we always take what he says as fact, don't we?
Walsh did compare an interview with Armstrong as "Frost - Nixon". I don't think he minds the attention all that much.
 
And the first broadcast interview with Lanced is on one of the BBC radio channels at 1pm today.
If you want a pack of lies you should be able to fill your boots
I don't. I haven't even read the interviews. I might take an interest if he co-operates with any UCI investigation.
 

Mr Haematocrit

msg me on kik for android
I don't. I haven't even read the interviews. I might take an interest if he co-operates with any UCI investigation.

I think the interviews are quite interesting, he mentions communicating with the UCI and WADA however the manner in which he does so suggests to me that he is unwilling to do so without conditions relating to his punishment.
I get the feeling he still thinks he holds some of the cards.
 

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
I think the interviews are quite interesting, he mentions communicating with the UCI and WADA however the manner in which he does so suggests to me that he is unwilling to do so without conditions relating to his punishment.
I get the feeling he still thinks he holds some of the cards.
I was wondering about this after reading the bit where he invites Cookson to call him yet says he'll only talk if it means a reduced ban. It's a funny strategy because he's made it almost impossible for Cookson to call him without it looking like horse trading yet the result of blocking contact is that he never gets the possibility of riding competitively again. He's holding himself hostage.
 

rich p

ridiculous old lush
Location
Brighton
I'm not going to read or listen to any more Armstrong interviews. It's the same stuff ad nauseam with no real regret or honesty.
Even if he spilled the beans I'm not sure what he actually has to offer now. Most is in the public domain already and apart from pointing the finger at a few more riders, DSs and trainers, (which he says is not his style) what will he reveal?
The UCI were colluding in making positives go away? No shít!! Fat Pat and HV hve been sidelined already mainy due to the USADA fallout.
Just píss off Lancey boy. The media should stop pandering to him IMHO.
 
Top Bottom