doog
....
- Location
- The beautiful south
Bye, close the door quietly.
Do you not have a skull like most people?
do you read threads backwards ?
Bye, close the door quietly.
Do you not have a skull like most people?
Say your traveling at 15mph, you slip on a manhole and come off and bang your head on the kerb or whatever. With or without the helmet it will hurt. But the difference I think would be an open wound also, if you were not wearing a helmet. The impact would be reduced slightly too I would think if you had one on.
Loads of scenarios I can think of where a well fitting cycling helmet would help at least a bit.
Struggling to think of any where a helmet causes more damage etc...?
Personally I wear one only half the time. Don'twant my hair messed up sometimes, haha.
.
If these hippies are still alive and riding, perhaps they know something.I never knew this helmet debate forum existed...I wondered in by complete accident and was ambushed by a load hippies...im out of here
Look at Doog's first contribution to the thread. It ends with a cheap insult toward anyone who doesn't think the same way. Do those who are not helmet promoters descend to cheap insult so readily? I would suggest not, they engage the argument.
It is certainly cheap. I would expect better of primary school children.
I guess all of these wannabee heroes dont wear padding in their shorts either
Aww diddums - was Adrian mean to you?
Ooh - a hard man.... we're scared.
Say your traveling at 15mph, you slip on a manhole and come off and bang your head on the kerb or whatever. With or without the helmet it will hurt. But the difference I think would be an open wound also, if you were not wearing a helmet. The impact would be reduced slightly too I would think if you had one on.
Loads of scenarios I can think of where a well fitting cycling helmet would help at least a bit.
Struggling to think of any where a helmet causes more damage etc...?
.
Individuals whose helmets were reported to fit poorly had a 1.96-fold increased risk of head injury compared with those whose helmets fit well.
I'd suggest you are wrong.Look at Doog's first contribution to the thread. It ends with a cheap insult toward anyone who doesn't think the same way. Do those who are not helmet promoters descend to cheap insult so readily? I would suggest not, they engage the argument.
Complete garbage, I've ridden many motorcycles is everything from shorts, jeans, combat trousers, kevlar lined jeans full leathers and none of it made any difference to my safety. The worst off I had was when a car pulled across me I bounced of his bonnet and the worst injury I had was a whiplash injury. I didn't bang my head at all (hips and legs were bruised though - leathers didn't help there) and maybe without the helmet I'd not have had the whiplash that caused me issues for years after.Urban myth. A good helmet and good leathers are the bikers best friends.
The lack of helmet didn't cause the deaths, inappropriate riding for the road conditions caused the deaths. aka rider errorNo it didn't. It came in to reduce deaths, which is what it did. And, yes - the law would be brought in today if it wasn't already on the books.
Indeed we do, I'm sure plenty of people view cyclists in general this way - your point is?Well, we do need more donors...
well, if you go back a bit, you'll see a thread that describes that very thing..........(and, yes, I was there)Never seen a post yet from a rider who didnt wear a helmet, boasting about how much less damage he suffered to his head by not wearing one.
Until they start appearing en masse, I would rather keep a lid on that thin bit of skin between the road and my noggin.
I guess all of these wannabee heroes dont wear padding in their shorts either