Dogtrousers
Kilometre nibbler
I found this article elsewhere, and thought, maybe it's time to have a peep in the H&H forum to see what they make of it. The result was unsurprising.
Problem is that this chap, neurosurgeon or not, doesn't seem to be citing any evidence, just his opinion. OK, it's a step up from individual anecdotes but it doesn't really move the debate on one jot.
We know he's an expert at fixing brains after the fact but is he an expert in the dynamics of impacts? The properties of helmet materials? Has he actually been keeping records of injuries and whether helmets were worn and doing analysis on them? It doesn't appear so.
I'd tend to agree with him over his "flimsy" comments. Compare a horse rider's hat with a cycling helmet. It seems to me that it's one step up from wearing an egg-box on your head, but that's all. But that means nothing because I'm not a materials scientist, and neither is he. So it adds nothing really.
I'm not saying I necessarily disagree with the guy. Just that his status as surgeon doesn't give him any special insight.You could probably dig around and line up an equal and opposite quote from another, equally unqualified, surgeon to balance it out.
I've not seen anything since that Ben Goldacre study that actually provided anything interesting to the debate.
He also seems to be something of a plonker, which doesn't help.
Problem is that this chap, neurosurgeon or not, doesn't seem to be citing any evidence, just his opinion. OK, it's a step up from individual anecdotes but it doesn't really move the debate on one jot.
We know he's an expert at fixing brains after the fact but is he an expert in the dynamics of impacts? The properties of helmet materials? Has he actually been keeping records of injuries and whether helmets were worn and doing analysis on them? It doesn't appear so.
I'd tend to agree with him over his "flimsy" comments. Compare a horse rider's hat with a cycling helmet. It seems to me that it's one step up from wearing an egg-box on your head, but that's all. But that means nothing because I'm not a materials scientist, and neither is he. So it adds nothing really.
I'm not saying I necessarily disagree with the guy. Just that his status as surgeon doesn't give him any special insight.You could probably dig around and line up an equal and opposite quote from another, equally unqualified, surgeon to balance it out.
I've not seen anything since that Ben Goldacre study that actually provided anything interesting to the debate.
He also seems to be something of a plonker, which doesn't help.