Pale Rider
Legendary Member
Scotland has already been airbrushed out...http://www.ctc.org.uk/sites/default/files/ctcnationalcouncil-currentwebsitelist.pdf.
OK, apart from airbrushing Scotland, what has the CTC ever done for us?
Scotland has already been airbrushed out...http://www.ctc.org.uk/sites/default/files/ctcnationalcouncil-currentwebsitelist.pdf.
The only communication received from them was when subscrition renewal was required.I wouldn't be at all surprised to discover that a professional and carefully thought-out communications plan has been scuppered by a leak from someone disgruntled. In my experience over the years CTC has been pretty good at communication using its weekly email - but doing that requires discipline from everyone in the know.
Where's the press release?We are now clutching at straws if the excuse for finding out thru the media is being blamed to a leak. What leak? Nothing came out until the Council made the press release. Why hold back the plan if ever there was one.
Give them your email address and you'll get a weekly email from them.The only communication received from them was when subscrition renewal was required.
Also on Benstead's Linked-in page, from David CoxIt was on Philip Benstead's LinkedIn profile:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/change-branding-name-ctc-cycling-uk-demand-poll-whole-philip-bensteadBecause the new brand has been disclosed earlier than planned, some of you will have seen comments based on incomplete information. The new name and logo are just part of our new brand, they will be used in conjunction with images and additional text in a way that conveys much more than any logo could in isolation. It is also important to remember that the adoption of a new name and logo is not a panacea, just part of a process. The success of any brand is about how an organisation ‘lives and breathes’ its values through the work that it does.
Representative democracy is the current constitution of the club/charity. I think it's bonkers, but that's the way it is at the moment.Oh well, that's all right then ?![]()
srw, are you on their payroll ?
Which is rather more pertinent than the comments from someone called "Gregory Price" - who appears to have a bit of a vendetta himself.Try pressing 'Show More' at the bottom of the quote from David Cox.
The reason I didn't put a link in is that LinkedIn doesn't seem to like linking to individual posts but to pages - so the link would just show David Cox's spiel...
And I think most people have pegged yours!Depends on where you coming from... I think most people have pegged your position.
It's easily read as "cock" and actually means that in several languages.Can't see any mention of this on CTC website. CUK? I can only read this as 'suck'!
Oh I think plenty of people around Norwich remember it and are still a bit sore about it, especially those laid off each time Aviva shuffles jobs back-and-forth between Norwich, Yorkshire, Manchester every so often, now it's got no public expectation that it's a Norwich firm.Remember when Norwich Union became Aviva?
No? Neither does anyone else, and they're doing quite nicely.
I think they'd really be limiting their scope if they signed up with British Cycling and its backwards approaches to diversity, helmets, e-bikes, recumbents and loads of other topics.In more ways than one the Insurance has been the glue for CTC since the Charity bender. If the new Touring Club can get hold of decent insurance cover, it might be the catalyst. Worth trying to work with British Cycling and their Insurance.
There's a time for the letter of the rules and a time for the spirit of democracy. The letter of the rules says that the 16 or so councillors can commit an organisation to a complete change of direction by just voting and announcing, but surely the spirit of democracy dictates that they should try to take the other 67,000 members on the journey with them?At the very least the members of the Council who have been elected by the membership to be their representatives!
A communications plan should have been ready to roll as soon as the new brand was published on the trademark register, even if that publication was brought forwards for some reason.I wouldn't be at all surprised to discover that a professional and carefully thought-out communications plan has been scuppered by a leak from someone disgruntled.
There's been so much random gossip and speculation about a communication process that has been messed up by someone that it's difficult to be sure, but I'm pretty convinced I remember reading that the plan is to take the proposal to the next AGM - which is the route to convincing the membership.There's a time for the letter of the rules and a time for the spirit of democracy. The letter of the rules says that the 16 or so councillors can commit an organisation to a complete change of direction by just voting and announcing, but surely the spirit of democracy dictates that they should try to take the other 67,000 members on the journey with them?
leak as in willfully done or leak as in hit send too soon, do you think?Also on Benstead's Linked-in page, from David Cox
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/change-branding-name-ctc-cycling-uk-demand-poll-whole-philip-benstead
(My bold). That means a leak. That note also refers to (legal) collective responsibility.
On the other hand, I can't see the text from Tuohy you cite. Perhaps a page link would be helpful?
Savaged by a dead sheep.It was on Philip Benstead's LinkedIn profile:
So if anyone can replace the function of the CTC in providing Organisers liability insurance and provide an easy way to administer it at far less cost than the current full membership of £43 per person per year then I, personally, would sign up to that. Because, right now, the CTC is not what it used to be and I'm not sure that I want to continue to support it any more.