Cricket thread

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Location
Cheshire
Jimmy scored more runs than Hameed .... says it all really
 

Aravis

Putrid Donut
Location
Gloucester
I know it's purely academic, but anyone want to comment on this??
If the team which has the questionable benefit of my allegiance is in a position to enforce the follow-on, then generally I'm happier when they elect not to. Needing two wickets at tea on the final day is fine my me. Much more significantly, if I'm looking at 55 for 4 in the second innings I'd much rather my team is not chasing a target when this happens.

The article linked above made a lot of interesting points, but one factor it didn't mention is the weather. When the forecast suggests that interruptions are likely it makes sense to try to take the wickets as quickly as possible rather than making a lot of runs you probably won't need. Stoppages can be helpful to bowlsmen but are generally bad for batters. I'd suggest captains are more likely to enforce the follow-on when the forecast is doubtful, which tends to make a draw more likely whatever tactics are used. So the inference that a win is statistically less likely to be achieved by enforcing the follow-on could be flawed. I think that batting again could still be the more defensive option, but that doesn't make it wrong.
 

Pale Rider

Legendary Member
It appears David Lloyd has fallen on his racist sword at Sky, although they have granted him an honourable retirement.

Looks like Michael Holding has also thrown in the towel, although I'm not aware of any connection with racism in cricket.

Gower and Botham recently went the same way.

I reckon Lloyd will be the biggest miss, although they all did a decent job even if only his mother could love Botham.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/59741382
 
Just get tid of Mark Nicholas, he’s probably/possibly not a racist, but he’s a prize p***k!
 

jowwy

Can't spell, Can't Punctuate....Sue Me
It appears David Lloyd has fallen on his racist sword at Sky, although they have granted him an honourable retirement.

Looks like Michael Holding has also thrown in the towel, although I'm not aware of any connection with racism in cricket.

Gower and Botham recently went the same way.

I reckon Lloyd will be the biggest miss, although they all did a decent job even if only his mother could love Botham.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/59741382
Gower and botham retired after the last ashes series…..fair old time ago now.
 

Dogtrousers

Kilometre nibbler
It displays as one long link on my browser (and I can't open Twitter right now).

Meanwhile:

I don't think anyone's suggesting that he's retiring on anything other than his own terms.

I know it's a very long discussion, so I'll just quote the previous relevant post:

Pale Rider said: Looks like Michael Holding has also thrown in the towel, although I'm not aware of any connection with racism in cricket.
Bonefish Blues said: I really think that's rather unlikely...
[then linked to the Guardian article]
 

Bonefish Blues

Banging donk
Location
52 Festive Road
It displays as one long link on my browser (and I can't open Twitter right now).

Meanwhile:



I know it's a very long discussion, so I'll just quote the previous relevant post:

Pale Rider said: Looks like Michael Holding has also thrown in the towel, although I'm not aware of any connection with racism in cricket.
Bonefish Blues said: I really think that's rather unlikely...
[then linked to the Guardian article]
What do I need to do to clarify? I'm genuinely confused. ^_^

Michael Holding has retired in his mid-late 60s after over 30 years commentating, as he was indicating he would be doing when interviewed in 2019, IIRC.

He has been an outspoken campaigner against racism in cricket, and beyond, of which the SKY interview was one which particularly stuck in my mind. He also spoke about it on Desert Island Discs IIRC. I am not aware of any incidents of racism against MH directly.

That's about it, really.
 
Top Bottom