It would be useful if people were to state the very basic reason why daughters/sons/friends are getting the jab at well under 50 years old, no details needed. Otherwise it looks like you can get jabbed at 25 in some parts of the country![]()
You can according to my colleague who’s been invited (Harrow I think)It would be useful if people were to state the very basic reason why daughters/sons/friends are getting the jab at well under 50 years old, no details needed. Otherwise it looks like you can get jabbed at 25 in some parts of the country![]()
And if vaccination does reduce transmission, it makes sense from a public health point of view to prioritise occupations that come into contact with most people. Potential/probable superspreaders.Prioritisation for occupations may make less sense than age as the economy opens up more April onwards and people mix more regardless of occupation. However I agree with @Ajax Bay given the actual impact of prioritising occupations is relatively minor - and i don't think the admin would be that insurmountable - it would make sense to do so.
You can according to my colleague who’s been invited (Harrow I think)
'would you be willing to have the C19 vaccine if we offered you the job?'
Apparently his practice has got through the 50+. No UHC. Does same job as me, wahBut surely there's a reason for that? Underlying health, occupation, something else? Or maybe just pure luck 🤷♂️
Prioritisation for occupations may make less sense than age as the economy opens up more April onwards and people mix more regardless of occupation. However I agree with @Ajax Bay given the actual impact of prioritising occupations is relatively minor - and i don't think the admin would be that insurmountable - it would make sense to do so.
It would be useful if people were to state the very basic reason why daughters/sons/friends are getting the jab at well under 50 years old, no details needed. Otherwise it looks like you can get jabbed at 25 in some parts of the country![]()
Al had a bit of a delayed reaction to his. Jabbed on Saturday, slightly sore arm nothing more. On Wednesday he went to work and came home after 2 hours feeling like crap. 24 hours in bed, got up Thursday feeling fine.Had the jab (O-AZ) yesterday and absolutely no after effects 24 hours on - not even a sore arm. Although the vaccine burned going in unlike the painless flu jab I had back in December.
Seems to vary a lot by individual as to the effect:
Wife: following day was knackered, achy and sleepy.
Best mate: 'flattened' and felt very flu like for a couple of days.
His wife: no after effects whatsoever.
Al had a bit of a delayed reaction to his. Jabbed on Saturday, slightly sore arm nothing more. On Wednesday he went to work and came home after 2 hours feeling like crap. 24 hours in bed, got up Thursday feeling fine.
We have started a bit of a fitness thing at the moment. Al (husband) sees the 24 hours of not eating as a kick start to his diet! 🤣Arghhhh! You have now filled me with gloom as I'm now thinking I may have a delayed reaction on it's way.
Still, come what may it'd be worth it in the long run plus would get me out of a multitude of household duties.
I'm glad that Al (not sure what relation he is to you) is now feeling chipper!![]()
I have no idea why my youngest (uni student) was called up. We have discussed this at home and can only assume it her autism diagnosis. - Although she is a high functioning autistic.It would be useful if people were to state the very basic reason why daughters/sons/friends are getting the jab at well under 50 years old, no details needed. Otherwise it looks like you can get jabbed at 25 in some parts of the country![]()