It would be useful if people were to state the very basic reason why daughters/sons/friends are getting the jab at well under 50 years old, no details needed. Otherwise it looks like you can get jabbed at 25 in some parts of the country
You can according to my colleague who’s been invited (Harrow I think)It would be useful if people were to state the very basic reason why daughters/sons/friends are getting the jab at well under 50 years old, no details needed. Otherwise it looks like you can get jabbed at 25 in some parts of the country
And if vaccination does reduce transmission, it makes sense from a public health point of view to prioritise occupations that come into contact with most people. Potential/probable superspreaders.Prioritisation for occupations may make less sense than age as the economy opens up more April onwards and people mix more regardless of occupation. However I agree with @Ajax Bay given the actual impact of prioritising occupations is relatively minor - and i don't think the admin would be that insurmountable - it would make sense to do so.
You can according to my colleague who’s been invited (Harrow I think)
'would you be willing to have the C19 vaccine if we offered you the job?'
Apparently his practice has got through the 50+. No UHC. Does same job as me, wahBut surely there's a reason for that? Underlying health, occupation, something else? Or maybe just pure luck 🤷♂️
Prioritisation for occupations may make less sense than age as the economy opens up more April onwards and people mix more regardless of occupation. However I agree with @Ajax Bay given the actual impact of prioritising occupations is relatively minor - and i don't think the admin would be that insurmountable - it would make sense to do so.
It would be useful if people were to state the very basic reason why daughters/sons/friends are getting the jab at well under 50 years old, no details needed. Otherwise it looks like you can get jabbed at 25 in some parts of the country
Al had a bit of a delayed reaction to his. Jabbed on Saturday, slightly sore arm nothing more. On Wednesday he went to work and came home after 2 hours feeling like crap. 24 hours in bed, got up Thursday feeling fine.Had the jab (O-AZ) yesterday and absolutely no after effects 24 hours on - not even a sore arm. Although the vaccine burned going in unlike the painless flu jab I had back in December.
Seems to vary a lot by individual as to the effect:
Wife: following day was knackered, achy and sleepy.
Best mate: 'flattened' and felt very flu like for a couple of days.
His wife: no after effects whatsoever.
Al had a bit of a delayed reaction to his. Jabbed on Saturday, slightly sore arm nothing more. On Wednesday he went to work and came home after 2 hours feeling like crap. 24 hours in bed, got up Thursday feeling fine.
We have started a bit of a fitness thing at the moment. Al (husband) sees the 24 hours of not eating as a kick start to his diet! 🤣Arghhhh! You have now filled me with gloom as I'm now thinking I may have a delayed reaction on it's way.
Still, come what may it'd be worth it in the long run plus would get me out of a multitude of household duties.
I'm glad that Al (not sure what relation he is to you) is now feeling chipper!
I have no idea why my youngest (uni student) was called up. We have discussed this at home and can only assume it her autism diagnosis. - Although she is a high functioning autistic.It would be useful if people were to state the very basic reason why daughters/sons/friends are getting the jab at well under 50 years old, no details needed. Otherwise it looks like you can get jabbed at 25 in some parts of the country