Risex4
Dropped by the autobus
- Location
- The Green/Gray Hills Of Debunshire
Hi
Bit of a long story so I appologise in advance. I've decided to lose or else get rid of a previously - erm - "destructive" lifestyle by getting back into cycling which I always used to enjoy greatly. In my early 20s, I used to commute to work every day (5 miles each way) which gave me a reasonable fitness base to the point where I could (and did) jump in the saddle on a whim (or a bet) for a 100-miler. After far too many years of laziness where this base level was lost, I want to get back to it, and beyond if possible.
I've started cycling again around the turn of the year with commuting to work (5 miles again) and am now pushing out to longer rides with the weather starting to improve; I knocked out a few 15 milers around the city during Feb, building into a few 25-30 milers last week onto a 40 miler today (with a lovely selection of hill climbs in there aswell). Now my question is, in terms of developing your fitness (both in terms of sustainable avg speed and range), is there a general concensus to which approach is best? Am I better to knock out a 25-30 miler twice a week, a brief but increasingly intense 10 mile hop four/five times a week, or set just go for a biggie each week, looking to push further than last time (i.e my next planned ride I want to do in the next seven days is approx 50 miles). During my, ahem, lazier time, I had a routine of 15-20 miles around the canal path which I would do sporadically (maybe once every 5-6 months or so).
Also, two other quickies if I may. I appreciate there is another forum for detailed discussion on equipment, so a one word answer would be brilliant as a pointer;
1) At the moment Im just wearing trackies and a sports top, which are fairly loose fitting and Im guessing do create a bit of drag/extra work? Is cycling gear (shorts and shirt) going to introduce a massive benefit in performance to someone who is just starting back out? I'd rather not go out spend money on gear needlessly is the benefit would be minimal.
and 2) Im on a hybrid (Dawes Discovry 301 if that means anything to anyone) which I've had for about 12 years. Its starting to show its age a bit but has been generally well looked after and is still in good nick. Would switching across to "proper" road bike be massively beneficial staight away, or would you suggest stick with what Im on, and then maybe look into it further down the line when the fitness is better so I can get more of a return out of it rather than perhaps "wasting" it now? If that makes any sense?!data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9eeb6/9eeb659edbc3005443c2204dafe32f68bfa7bffb" alt="Laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
Again, appols for length. Thanks for reading, and any tips greatly recieved!
Bit of a long story so I appologise in advance. I've decided to lose or else get rid of a previously - erm - "destructive" lifestyle by getting back into cycling which I always used to enjoy greatly. In my early 20s, I used to commute to work every day (5 miles each way) which gave me a reasonable fitness base to the point where I could (and did) jump in the saddle on a whim (or a bet) for a 100-miler. After far too many years of laziness where this base level was lost, I want to get back to it, and beyond if possible.
I've started cycling again around the turn of the year with commuting to work (5 miles again) and am now pushing out to longer rides with the weather starting to improve; I knocked out a few 15 milers around the city during Feb, building into a few 25-30 milers last week onto a 40 miler today (with a lovely selection of hill climbs in there aswell). Now my question is, in terms of developing your fitness (both in terms of sustainable avg speed and range), is there a general concensus to which approach is best? Am I better to knock out a 25-30 miler twice a week, a brief but increasingly intense 10 mile hop four/five times a week, or set just go for a biggie each week, looking to push further than last time (i.e my next planned ride I want to do in the next seven days is approx 50 miles). During my, ahem, lazier time, I had a routine of 15-20 miles around the canal path which I would do sporadically (maybe once every 5-6 months or so).
Also, two other quickies if I may. I appreciate there is another forum for detailed discussion on equipment, so a one word answer would be brilliant as a pointer;
1) At the moment Im just wearing trackies and a sports top, which are fairly loose fitting and Im guessing do create a bit of drag/extra work? Is cycling gear (shorts and shirt) going to introduce a massive benefit in performance to someone who is just starting back out? I'd rather not go out spend money on gear needlessly is the benefit would be minimal.
and 2) Im on a hybrid (Dawes Discovry 301 if that means anything to anyone) which I've had for about 12 years. Its starting to show its age a bit but has been generally well looked after and is still in good nick. Would switching across to "proper" road bike be massively beneficial staight away, or would you suggest stick with what Im on, and then maybe look into it further down the line when the fitness is better so I can get more of a return out of it rather than perhaps "wasting" it now? If that makes any sense?!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9eeb6/9eeb659edbc3005443c2204dafe32f68bfa7bffb" alt="Laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
Again, appols for length. Thanks for reading, and any tips greatly recieved!