jimboalee said:
"Nothing wears "IN".. only out.".
Then explain.... Why a mechanical wristwatch SLOWS during its 'Wearing in" period?
Surely, if the mechanism is 'wearing out', it should get looser and SPEED UP!
Cant..
I suppose what i was trying to say was if you put a new chain on a worn cassette it is going to shorten the life of the chain. The term "wear in" is being used in a false manner, because all that is happening is the chain is wearing to the pitch of the worn cassette. Which is no longer 1/2".
Panter said:
Thanks for the help guys, I now have another question though
My cassette, on
CRC, is £8.99. Now, for that price, it simply isn't worth changing the chain to protect the cassette as the chain cost more than the cassette would!
Is there any merit in me buying a "better" cassette? can I expect longer life as that may be the only benefit, I certainly can't fault it's shifting performance.
Or, should I just be thankful to the good people at CRC for ensuring that a replacement cassette costs less than a cheapy rear light and get another one the same?
Be thankful that a cassette is cheep like a budgie, because it wears as a "unit" with the chain and should be replaced with the chain.
If you spend out on a M770 cassette all you get is an alloy body to carry the nicely shot peened and chrome plated sprockets (which is a good idea if using an alloy freehub body esp. if your a heaver) as it prevents the steel sprockets "chewing" into the splines. Also you get an alloy lock-ring and some lovely "pick-up" pins on the back of the lowest sprocket for people who don't know how to set their limit-stop screws.
So basically the more you spend the less you get (in terms of weight).
My advice is spend as little as possible on a chain that you are happy is good quality and a basic but functional cassette. Because a chain doesn't care how much the cassette cost it's gonna wear it as it wears.
Hmm.. i should find a less anorak past time
..
Coming back to the wrist watch.. im intrigued now. Surely the reason it slows is because it is wearing things, that are not 100% perfect to themselves, which creates a loss in efficiency, therefore slowing it due to friction?
If this is the case the faces are effectively being machined together.. speaking parallel for a moment it is the same case with replacement cup and cone bearings. The faces of the cones are scarcely machined perfectly (unless higher end shimano and campy units). Teamed with bearings that are not 100% spherical, because this is next to impossible esp. when paying 65p a pack of 22 balls. Which means when setting the bearing preload you often get a tight spot, which dissapears after the cones have worked loose and been re-adjusted.
If all this is the same case in a watch nthen it is wearing material away, therfore out...?!!!?
Rant over, who knows?