If we don't get a grip of the figures how to use them and who need's them at time they need them. Get testing options and availably better at a ground level. Get the turn around and results better joined up. Underlined with effective tracking and clear simple not conflicting public health messages. All sorted my the autumn which is quickly coming down the line then we are toast.
I think the government are just focusing on the saliva test (whenever that's rolled out properly) and gearing up for the winter. And the economy, holidays, schools and pubs.
I don't think Leicester is worth panicking around, what it seems to show to me is government ineptitude about sharing information (and a lot of promises going out live on air right now). It also shows that the numbers within giganticly large margins of error in Leicester were steady for about a month before going upwards. This is very broadly similar to other places in the world where for 1-2 months in places if there isn't a superspreader event things circulate for one to two months and take off.
Also the govenment and PHE need to do proper graphics. This leads to the sort of conclusion jumping we've seen on this thread. Leicester as far as can be gauged is far, far, far worse than the other yellow areas on that map, which those are in turn are far worse than many of the other areas in the north of England and Midlands.
It's government ineptitude we need to worry most about.