We are all cyclists.
Cycling involves exposure to major hazards potentially resulting in injury or death every time we get on our bikes:
Collisions with other traffic.
Pedestrians.
Mechanical failures
Potholes
etc
Blimey. Why aren't you riding on quieter roads, how vicious are the pedestrians near you and how badly-maintained is your bike if those are
major hazards
every time you get on your bike?
The only way of being a completely safe cyclist is to lock up and never ride your bike.
Then by definition, you wouldn't be a cyclist, m'lud. And unless you are doing nothing else instead (see past comments about the surge in DIY injuries during lockdown), then you may be less safe. And if you do nothing, inactivity may pose a greater risk than cycling, so you're still not completely safe.
How do we stay acceptably safe?
We STAY ALERT to the hazards, and in doing so minimise our probability of having an accident and thereby keep our risk to an acceptable level.
No, I really don't. I'm sometimes pretty dozy as I cycle along - and a few times not by choice (where picking the bike was also because it makes me less dangerous to others than if I drove). If I've managed the risks by cycling on a well-maintained bike on a nice route and I don't pick fights with walkers, there's not much I need to be alert to - basically, I need to be mildly alert at junctions. I know some people on here are adrenaline junkies who ride in extreme ways and enjoy jousting with motorists, but I really can't be doing with that shoot any more.
Screaming "go on, you can cycle down the A10, just stay alert!" is not a way to get more people cycling more, although it has been the cornerstone of government's approach to cycling for as long as I've been alive. It's a shame if they're going to use the same shoot approach for the covid crisis now.