Andy in Germany
Guru
- Location
- Rottenburg am Neckar
According to the European centre for diesase preventionand control, the UK passed Germany as the country with the third highest number of cases in Europe yesterday.
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
The data on infections and deaths are so poor it's hard to back any view that voluntary measures got us to this point.
The guy is not an epidemiologist but a GP. He's entitled to his own views and ideas but i'd wait until we really have the full facts and true stats.
We need to be very open minded of anyone who talks about certainty when facts are too iffy at the moment.
In interviews he often comes across as someone boarding on conspiracy theories.
The guy is not an epidemiologist but a GP. He's entitled to his own views and ideas but i'd wait until we really have the full facts and true stats.
We need to be very open minded of anyone who talks about certainty when facts are too iffy at the moment.
In interviews he often comes across as someone boarding on conspiracy theories.
This guy really is clueless but even worse he looks to be in total denial.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdkNRmrDtp4
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdkNRmrDtp4
roubaixtuesday
self serving virtue signaller
Is this meant to relate to the "oxford report" mentioned above?
If so, it makes no claims to when the peak infections were, so seems irrelevant?
Also, it's not a remotely a scientific report, more a short opinion piece or press release.
Yes it is
Here is another one
https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/covid-19-death-data-in-england-update-2th-april/
Here is another one
https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/covid-19-death-data-in-england-update-2th-april/
roubaixtuesday
self serving virtue signaller
Yes it is what?
The disclaimer is pretty clear
the article has not been peer-reviewed; it should not replace individual clinical judgement, and the sources cited should be checked. The views expressed in this commentary represent the views of the authors and not necessarily those of the host institution, the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care. The views are not a substitute for professional medical advice.
the article has not been peer-reviewed; it should not replace individual clinical judgement, and the sources cited should be checked. The views expressed in this commentary represent the views of the authors and not necessarily those of the host institution, the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care. The views are not a substitute for professional medical advice.
We are now having to wear masks all day.
Thin ,poor fitted, all it does is make my exhaled air go up into my eyes and steam up my specs..And tickle, so the urge to rub them has increased also..
On the plus side I look heaps better
Have you enough in stock to change them over the course of a day or is it one for all day?
roubaixtuesday
self serving virtue signaller
But it makes no mention whatever of the peak being before lockdown, which was the claim. How is it relevant? I'm very confused.
glasgowcyclist
Charming but somewhat feckless
- Location
- Scotland
roubaixtuesday
self serving virtue signaller
Well beats me
I suppose they interpolate from the peak deaths that peak infections occured before the lockdown
No, they don't. The issue is not even mentioned in the article you linked. Why do you think it's relevant?
