There appear to be serious flaws in the initial study. A good summary of the situation here, with report links:
https://www.sciencealert.com/small-...ial-is-not-effective-for-treating-coronavirus
plus more here:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30817-5/fulltext
https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/369/bmj.m1432.full.pdf
A more optimistic note:
https://wellcome.ac.uk/news/can-chl...rus-disease-only-research-will-give-us-answer
and a demolition job:
https://scienceintegritydigest.com/...zithromycin-treatment-of-covid-19-infections/
.
That is a shame. Mrs @BoldonLad has been drinking copious quantities of gin and tonic, for the past two weeks, for the Quinine, of course.
In other good news new cases and deaths are falling in Sweden for the 3rd consecutive day despite lack of lockdown😊
If PM Kier Starmer dropped a clanger like moving to his second home in the same scenario, I'd be making the same criticism.It's not about Boris Johnson, it's about the Prime Minister. Whoever he/she is, their residences are 10 Downing Street and Chequers where there are security arrangements in place and facilities to carry out the job of leading government.
Can't help but think that it's blind hatred of the man that's driving the criticism. Were Sir Keir Starmer PM in similar circumstances, exactly the same arrangements would apply.
I just said it is indeed a good news 😊
Let's start from the standpoint that (i) Boris is still very ill and is unlikely to be leading government any time soon - he was in Intensive Care up until a couple of days ago (ii) he still might be infectious and could pass on the virus to someone at Chequers - who could then transmit it to vulnerable people in the Bucks communities. I don't care who we are talking about - he or she has a responsibility not to infect people in other communities. Leadership is about setting an example.It's not about Boris Johnson, it's about the Prime Minister. Whoever he/she is, their residences are 10 Downing Street and Chequers where there are security arrangements in place and facilities to carry out the job of leading government.
Can't help but think that it's blind hatred of the man that's driving the criticism. Were Sir Keir Starmer PM in similar circumstances, exactly the same arrangements would apply.
Let's start from the standpoint that (i) Boris is still very ill and is unlikely to be leading government any time soon - he was in Intensive Care up until a couple of days ago (ii) he still might be infectious and could pass on the virus to someone at Chequers - who could then transmit it to vulnerable people in the Bucks communities. I don't care who we are talking about - he or she has a responsibility not to infect people in other communities. Leadership is about setting an example.
Common people, mate. He lives in a flat above a shop.Sorry, I take it back. Third it is, as the flat that the cops attended is presumably out of the picture. The flat they live in at Downing St is the mahoosive one above no 11. Presumably they are renting out the massive house they've just bought in Camberwell (counting dwellings is one thing, counting incomes will be a bit more of a challenge). And of course the house he and his ex have just sold for something in the region of £4M doesn't count. All in it together, see.
Downing Street......he has a flat there. 200 people don't share his flat with him. He won't be walking around the offices.....the bloke is sick.OK - the choices are
1) Stay in hospital (I'm sure no-one would mind him taking up a hospital bed when others may need it more)
2) Downing St - where 200* people are working and running government during a national crisis. I'm sure having a sick -and as you point out, possibly infectious man would be a point of valid criticism.
3) Chequers.
All the possibilities of passing on the virus exist wherever he goes. Where's the safest place out of the 3 options?
*200 under normal circumstances. May be less, could be more at the moment.
Are you party to the advice he received from his medical team? Perhaps he was strongly advised to recuperate somewhere away from the centre of governmentDowning Street......he has a flat there. 200 people don't share his flat with him. He won't be walking around the offices.....the bloke is sick.
Not passing judgement but if he is going to do something contrary to the govs own advice, it would be a good idea to explain the reasoning.Are you party to the advice he received from his medical team? Perhaps he was strongly advised to recuperate somewhere away from the centre of government