Coronavirus outbreak

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Ming the Merciless

There is no mercy
Location
Inside my skull
Go on find me the paper where it says 75% of people are fully protected against omricon after 3 jabs ......

Or cut your losses.

The 75% is derived from the numbers vaccinated infected vs. not infected vs. those not vaccinated etc etc. It’s called efficacy. To say someone’s immune system works 75% of the time against Omicron makes no sense. You are saying that 3 out of 4 times your immune system would work then the 4th it wouldn’t. Which is nonsense.
 
The 75% is derived from the numbers vaccinated infected vs. not infected vs. those not vaccinated etc etc. It’s called efficacy. To say someone’s immune system works 75% of the time against Omicron makes no sense. You are saying that 3 out of 4 times your immune system would work then the 4th it wouldn’t. Which is nonsense.

No I asked for the paper where you get the information that 75% of the treble jabbed have 100% protection against omricon .
 

classic33

Leg End Member
Are you saying that you have successfully submitted a home test result with a fabricated QR code, or are you hypothesising ?
You use the number, above the, QR code, when you phone the result in.
IMG_20211216_221150.jpg
 

DaveReading

Don't suffer fools gladly (must try harder!)
Location
Reading, obvs
You use the number, above the, QR code, when you phone the result in.

I'm not sure what your point is. The QR code is just the number is a different form, it doesn't matter which you use.

Or are you suggesting that when you phone in a result rather than submitting it online, the number isn't validated?
 

Ming the Merciless

There is no mercy
Location
Inside my skull
So no paper exists then.

At least weve cleared that up.

So no paper exists you say. So you are saying the 75% is just a figure made up by papers. If you understood probability you’d understand that the 75% could never refer to the protection an individual is conferred via a booster jab.
 

Ming the Merciless

There is no mercy
Location
Inside my skull
I'm not sure what your point is. The QR code is just the number is a different form, it doesn't matter which you use.

Or are you suggesting that when you phone in a result rather than submitting it online, the number isn't validated?

What I am saying is that the number is trivial to make up if you are that way inclined. Less than a minute‘s effort. I’m saying online.
 

classic33

Leg End Member
I'm not sure what your point is. The QR code is just the number is a different form, it doesn't matter which you use.

Or are you suggesting that when you phone in a result rather than submitting it online, the number isn't validated?
I've phoned all my results through, using the number on the test strip. One refused as it had already been used.*

*Reading from the book, which didn't have the most recent test entered in it.
 

DaveReading

Don't suffer fools gladly (must try harder!)
Location
Reading, obvs
What I am saying is that the number is trivial to make up if you are that way inclined. Less than a minute‘s effort. I’m saying online.

Though not as trivial as just ordering a box of kits with genuine numbers, that won't require you type in an average of 5 different numbers per test in order to find one that's accepted ...
 

lazybloke

Priest of the cult of Chris Rea
Location
Leafy Surrey
And the anger against Chris Whitty is ratcheting up.
Check out the Sky New press review to see Carole Malone frothing with anger about his scientific analysis.
 

DCLane

Found in the Yorkshire hills ...
And the anger against Chris Whitty is ratcheting up.
Check out the Sky New press review to see Carole Malone frothing with anger about his scientific analysis.

Unqualified media airhead gets 'angry' with an internationally respected medical scientist ... she's no basis of understanding or intellect to do anything but be 'angry' :huh:
 
Top Bottom