kingrollo
Guru
Go on find me the paper where it says 75% of people are fully protected against omricon after 3 jabs ......I suggest to read the actual paper and the maths.
Or cut your losses.
Go on find me the paper where it says 75% of people are fully protected against omricon after 3 jabs ......I suggest to read the actual paper and the maths.
Go on find me the paper where it says 75% of people are fully protected against omricon after 3 jabs ......
Or cut your losses.
Go on find me the paper where it says 75% of people are fully protected against omricon after 3 jabs ......
Or cut your losses.
The 75% is derived from the numbers vaccinated infected vs. not infected vs. those not vaccinated etc etc. It’s called efficacy. To say someone’s immune system works 75% of the time against Omicron makes no sense. You are saying that 3 out of 4 times your immune system would work then the 4th it wouldn’t. Which is nonsense.
You use the number, above the, QR code, when you phone the result in.Are you saying that you have successfully submitted a home test result with a fabricated QR code, or are you hypothesising ?
No I asked for the paper where you get the information that 75% of the treble jabbed have 100% protection against omricon .
So no paper exists then.Well it will be the same one you referenced since you are quoting this 75% figure per individual which makes no sense.
You use the number, above the, QR code, when you phone the result in.
So no paper exists then.
At least weve cleared that up.
I'm not sure what your point is. The QR code is just the number is a different form, it doesn't matter which you use.
Or are you suggesting that when you phone in a result rather than submitting it online, the number isn't validated?
I've phoned all my results through, using the number on the test strip. One refused as it had already been used.*I'm not sure what your point is. The QR code is just the number is a different form, it doesn't matter which you use.
Or are you suggesting that when you phone in a result rather than submitting it online, the number isn't validated?
What I am saying is that the number is trivial to make up if you are that way inclined. Less than a minute‘s effort. I’m saying online.
And the anger against Chris Whitty is ratcheting up.
Check out the Sky New press review to see Carole Malone frothing with anger about his scientific analysis.
My young daughter got angry when I told her she couldn’t have haribo for dinner.Unqualified media airhead gets 'angry' with an internationally respected medical scientist ... she's no basis of understanding or intellect to do anything but be 'angry'