mjr
Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
- Location
- mostly Norfolk, sometimes Somerset
Only for under 18s, or have you seen otherwise?The "do not test" is government advice now,
Only for under 18s, or have you seen otherwise?The "do not test" is government advice now,
Only for under 18s, or have you seen otherwise?
What you can do if you’re not eligible for a free COVID-19 test
You’re no longer advised to get tested. Find out:
That’s not what the employer said in my interpretation but clearly you have a different interpretation. We will just have to agree that we have different interpretations of how shoot or not the employer is being.
I wasn't interpreting anything. That was a direct quote from the post you had responded to.
You were interpreting whether the employer was being shoot or had you forgotten that bit? 🙄
@Slick said "My work is quite clear, do not test, they don't want to know. If you are fit, come to work, if you aren't, stay at home."
"If you are fit, come to work, if not stay home" seems perfectly reasonable and normal.
That’s not what the employer said in my interpretation but clearly you have a different interpretation. We will just have to agree that we have different interpretations of how shoot or not the employer is being.
No, I was asking why you thought the employer was shoot. And pointing out that I thought the quoted statement was perfectly reaonsable.
Minging one - In what way is "If you are fit, come to work, if not stay home" "shoot"? How about articulating, briefly what a good employer's policy should be? Help us understand your perspective which leads you to describe such an employer's policy as 'shoot'.
They cannot require employees to test (unless a health or social care setting); tests are no longer freely available. Do you think people should test for flu?
Or is this just an 'interpretation' problem you have?
If an employee has tested positive then they are not fit to come into work are they? Yet the employer doesn’t want to know about that and says come in anyway. That’s shoot behaviour in my book.
Look if you can’t see it, given the same information, then nothing I say is going to change your mind. I think the employer should take their employees health more seriously, you don’t. That’s the sum of it.
You missed out entirely referencing the part which you have now explained to Ajax Bay which is what you thought made the employer shoot.
Have a think on it, rather than just be contrarian for the sake of it.
My work, which is a non departmental government body expects you in unless you are unfit. Covid is to be treated like any other illness. [They reiterate] My work is quite clear, do not test, they don't want to know. If you are fit, come to work, if you aren't, stay at home.
Employee: 'I'm feeling unwell'If an employee has tested positive then they are not fit to come into work are they? Yet the employer doesn’t want to know about that and says come in anyway. That’s shoot behaviour in my book.
That says you're not advised to test. It does not advise "do not test", like you claimed.