The blocks deform and due to the blocks there is less contact areaQuote from an above link "knobby tires cannot achieve lean angles of smooth tires and offer no cornering advantage on pavement"
I would have thought the complete opposite!
This is so true!One of the most important things to remember whilst cornering is to remember to relax.
Tensing up will cause you to pull the bike to the outside, losing control, and forcing yourself to brake to regain control.
If you tense up while cornering, you tend to push your center of gravity away from the corner or toward your outside. This causes you to pull hard to the outside and can easily cause you to crash. So, practice cornering until you learn to instinctively relax while cornering.
If you are tensed up going into a corner everything else will go out the window.
One of the most important things to remember whilst cornering is to remember to relax.
Tensing up will cause you to pull the bike to the outside, losing control, and forcing yourself to brake to regain control.
If you tense up while cornering, you tend to push your center of gravity away from the corner or toward your outside. This causes you to pull hard to the outside and can easily cause you to crash. So, practice cornering until you learn to instinctively relax while cornering.
If you are tensed up going into a corner everything else will go out the window.
Gravel is my only real fear when cornering on fast descents, which leads me to slow down at the wrong times making the corners more work than they needed to be. In Suffolk we just plain don't have the types of hills that are fast and long in Suffolk so I don't get the practice.
I've only just had the looking at the exit theory explained to me, I'm looking forward to getting the chance to try it.
(Altitude change/distance travelled) x 100%.I know it's probably been done on another thread but can someone explain the gradient percentage to a simpleton?
(Altitude change/distance travelled) x 100%.
So if you gain 100 metres in 1 km that is an average of (100 / 1000) x 100% = 10 %.
If you descend 50 metres in 250 metres that is an average of (-50 / 250) x 100% = -20%.
Strictly speaking, gradient should be calculated as (change in altitude / horizontal distance travelled) x 100%, but it isn't practical to measure through the soil and rock of hillsides, so the distance along the road is used instead. For a climb calculated this way as 20%, the error is only 0.41% (i.e. the true gradient is 20.41%).
They could, but they don't!Cheers. Why can't they just measure it in degrees!