@silva I'm going to guess you don't often cycle up 1 in 10 hills. Otherwise running the chains that long will wear your chainring rather quickly, and it then slips when a serious climb is undertaken. Maybe your chainring is made of steel, though, as opposed to everyone else's: made of aluminium (cue people telling us anecdotes about their steel chainrings which lasted for generations).
I don't run the chains that long, I run the chainrings that long, current one since begin 2019, a Velosolo alu one, and it stops wearing further after mounting a new chain, although the chains wear 3 times faster.
And I do climb up steep land elevations and railway bridges and tunnels, with bike + luggage equipment + luggage 30-80 kilo. Sometimes I stall due near top due to wind there meeting less, then I walk further to top.
What happened so far: a rear cog that lost a tooth now and then. I didn't notice it on the moment, I notice it at a next inspection, home, at work, or along the road after I felt something under a tire, and check for glass, nail, whatever.
So no need to guess, it's all said, and has been said before.
The times I experienced chain/ring "slips", were 15 years ago, the time that I rode bicycles with 3 x 7 gears with me using only the biggest ring and the two smallest cogs.
I DID experience slips during the 10 singlespeed years, after pallets of freewheels froze into place, or after heavy rain made grease inside sticky enough to resist the springs in flopping them back.
Getting rid of that problem was then the direct reason to move from singlespeed to fixed gear.
And since, I became a chain chainring cog do it yourselver, in minimal time.
Before, it was a story of a defunc bike, getting it to the dealer, weeks upto 9 months awaiting repair, in meantime using a spare bike, that in the end (the 9 months) became defunc without the first bike having been repaired yet.
I'm sure there are better dealers out there in the world, but in my region, the very rare ones that are, are overloaded with work, and honest enough to just say that, instead of accepting and making promises without holding them. So, my choices related to bicycles, are just addressing that situation, that's all, nothing more to it. It's not that I'm religious on domains like fixed gear and steel chainrings that last for generations (I assume OPERATION, not in some barn in the backyard haha).
That last is just bullshit because in the end, if mechanical transmission parts do not match eachothers pitch, then something has to give, break. Imagine a chain with a 1 inch pitch between the links running over sprocket teeth with 1/2 inch pitch. That's not "engaging" anymore eh, that's just slamming into eachother, with the force being absorbed there and not transmitted anymore.
And that is what explains what I experienced. Make sure that engaging and disengaging goes easy, THEN wear of sprocket teeth is minimal. My chainring and cog have short teeth, wide valleys between them. Easy for the chain links to engage and disengage. That's why the teeth nearly didn't wear further at all. That's why sharkfin shape teeth aggravate wear, and cause teeth to break off: the chain links rollers have to climb over the hooks to disengage, hollowing out the teeths edge, making it even sharper hooked.