IMHO.. Cadence depends on where you live, for me as I live on a mountain which is 1,700 metres.. ave speed over a distance is more helpful..
but surely you don't pedal downhill? - so wouldn't this effect the averages?If cadence 'depends on where you live' (personally, I can't see how it would make a difference) - surely average speed would also be highly dependent on where you live - especially if you live in a hilly area.
but surely you don't pedal downhill? - so wouldn't this effect the averages?
So I average 150w over 5 miles going up then down a 2.5 mile 7% gradient. The fastest average possible with that power is 9.37mph. I do 150w on the flat I average 18.83mph. With a trekking triple & 11-27 cassette I have an average cadence of 69rpm assuming that I stay in bottom gear up the climb & top gear on the descent.but surely you don't pedal downhill? - so wouldn't this effect the averages?
but surely you don't pedal downhill? - so wouldn't this effect the averages?
If cadence 'depends on where you live' (personally, I can't see how it would make a difference) - surely average speed would also be highly dependent on where you live - especially if you live in a hilly area.
Your right average speed is dependent on where you live, but on the other hand I cant see anyone having a cadence of 110 going up a 15% to 20% climb like we have over here, and once you have hit top speed on your bike coming down the same hill (which takes no time at all) your not pedaling anyway so no cadence.
We all view things a different way and mine is average speed over a set distance.
Just my view..![]()
cadence is obviously only relevant while the pedals are turning - and inevitably your cadence will drop if you ride up hill. Which is why cadence is pretty pointless and average cadence is even more pointless...