DCBassman
Guru
- Location
- The lumpy far South West
One of the reasons I upgraded the brakes on the Revell mixte was that the brakes were a) barely adequate at the front, and b) almost non-existent at the back. It didn't matter what I tried. they were borderline dangerous, what with all the steep bits around these parts.
Cue fit some Tektro R559 long drops, as this was a 27.5 to 700c conversion.
Result? Great front brake. Much improved rear brake, but not nearly as good as the 105s on the Scott, or the older Tektros that were on the Scott previously. The rear brake on the Scott is not far shy of the front in terms of retardation.
So why might the rear of this mixte be generally worse? The cable run isn't so straightforward. The original Weinmann was bottom-fed, but the replacements cannot be, so there's a tighter than usual bend for the cable to get through before it reaches the caliper.
This is the only reason I can think of, though. Rims cleaned with isopropanol. Blocks look good. The fact of the longer drop hasn't done much to affect the front, so don't see why the back should be so weak, comparatively. Any ideas, folks?
Cue fit some Tektro R559 long drops, as this was a 27.5 to 700c conversion.
Result? Great front brake. Much improved rear brake, but not nearly as good as the 105s on the Scott, or the older Tektros that were on the Scott previously. The rear brake on the Scott is not far shy of the front in terms of retardation.
So why might the rear of this mixte be generally worse? The cable run isn't so straightforward. The original Weinmann was bottom-fed, but the replacements cannot be, so there's a tighter than usual bend for the cable to get through before it reaches the caliper.
This is the only reason I can think of, though. Rims cleaned with isopropanol. Blocks look good. The fact of the longer drop hasn't done much to affect the front, so don't see why the back should be so weak, comparatively. Any ideas, folks?