Bradley Wiggins calls for safer cycling laws and compulsory helmets

Status
Not open for further replies.
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Wobblers

Euthermic
Location
Minkowski Space
[QUOTE 1971893, member: 45"]Still having trouble interpreting research. Pedestrians include drunks, the frail elderly and the wreckless.[/quote]

Oddly enough, you'll find those groups well represented in motorist casualties.
 

Norm

Guest
do you have a source for this ?
I'd like to think a tangy Worcestershire would work well, but HP would suffice at a push.:thumbsup:
 

Wobblers

Euthermic
Location
Minkowski Space
[QUOTE 1971633, member: 45"]My point was that helmets are not I believe tested with anything other than direct impacts, and that these results have little connecting with travelling speed before an incident.[/quote]

Helmets are not designed to cope with rotational impacts. This is one reason why the testing regime only deals with direct impacts. Travelling speed has a direct correlation with the magnitude of rotational forces experienced in an incident. In a crash, horizontal velocity is often transferred to vertical velocity, and makes multiple impacts more likely - I have a broken ankle which is a direct testament to that. In short, horizontal velocity is very much relevant.
 

benb

Evidence based cyclist
Location
Epsom
No because I'm intelligent enough to know that most cyclists already wear helmets vs the 100% of pedestrians who don't, thus the accident statistics are inherantly skewed.

That makes no sense. Either the small risk of a head injury is worth protecting against, or it isn't.
Why is the risk of a head injury on a bicycle worth protecting against, but the risk of a head injury as a pedestrian not worth protecting against?
 

Fnaar

Smutmaster General
Location
Thumberland
I'd wear one of those "bunch of bananas " style old leather helmets if I could find one.

-----------------------------------
Sent mobile phone stylee
 

glasgowcyclist

Charming but somewhat feckless
Location
Scotland
Here's an interesting and entertaining video presentation on helmet safety,
design, and engineering. If you don't have time to watch it all, skip to 5min
37sec and watch from there.

http://youtu.be/07o-TASvIxY?t=5m37s

Copenhagen's bicycle ambassador talks about how important the bicycle is for liveable cities and how bicycle helmets are threatening bicycle culture.



GC
 
Help me out...
  1. If I hit you over the head with a baseball bat it will hurt
  2. If I hit you over the head with a baseball bat whilst you are wearing a cycle helmet with a level of force insufficient to break the helmet it will hurt less
  3. If I hit you over the head with a baseball bat whilst you are wearing a cycle helmet with a level of force sufficient to break the helmet it will hurt. How much less than 1 will it hurt?


  1. Better still. If I swing a baseball bat one inch above the top of your head the worst you will feel is the draught on your head. If I swing a baseball bat one inch above the top of your head and you are wearing a cycle helmet it will hurt a lot. Over millenia of evolution we have got pretty good at not hitting out heads when we fall but put a helmet on and suddenly your head is a lot larger and the evolutionary protection mechanisms and the instincts learnt since birth no longer work. I know. I am quite tall and back in the days when I wore a helmet I was continually banging it on things, particularly door frames, something I never did without the helmet. And sometimes it was very painful, especially when it wrenched your neck.
 

lukesdad

Guest
Apparently head injuries are quite common in Angling. Must be those high velocity weights they use. Of course their helmets should be camo ones, I guess. :laugh:
 

172traindriver

Legendary Member
[QUOTE 1972243, member: 45"]That's what they want us to all believe...[/quote]

One of life great mysteries, who was responsible???????
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom