Night Train
Maker of Things
- Location
- Greater Manchester
Surely the adverse change in aerodynamics of a bike fitted to the outside of a Land Rover would be similar to the weight penalty of a passenger in an articulated lorry.
60 - 80mpg that is very impressive, what make and model?
Some big 4x4's are not that bad in terms of aerodynamics as they may seem, not as good as a car but for those who have to use them any saving is worth having. I used to have a Land Rover that returned 8mpg on petrol. A change to a bigger diesel engine brought that up to around 35mpg. Many of the people I know who are fans of Land Rovers will want that or better but, granted, there are those who don't care about energy consumption, just as there are cyclist, and people from all walks of life, who don't care either.
Passengers in lorries? You'd be surprised at how much a driver will want to preserve what economy he/she can get from their truck. A passenger may not make a lot of difference but a poorly driven car ahead can make a big difference.
I drive an unmodified 2001 Skoda Octavia Estate TDi with 165,000miles on the clock. The best I got was 84mpg and I try not to drive it if the journey won't return better then 55mpg unless there is no option, trailer towing for instance.
My regular commutes of 30 miles and 70 miles return around 65 and 72mpg respectively on standard B5 pump fuel, and I'm no slouch either. It was significantly worse on B100 so I stopped using it.
My Dad's LR Discovery,when he still had it, used significantly less fuel then my car did over the time he had it just by not being used as much and only when really needed.