jules_s said:
of the shop toute suite.
And so the search continues....Debs is certainly worried about 'stepping off' the bike without her 'lady bits' meeting with a cross bar, but to me that means stepping forward from the saddle not to the side (if that makes sense) and having both feet on the floor straddling the bike.
Tell Debs from this middle-aged female cyclist (age 50) that if she has both feet flat on the floor when astride the bike and it is a traditional diamond frame, then the bike is too small. And to fear not - tiptoe is the way to go.
Traditional diamond frame of Gino, my Bianchi San Remo: not managed to injure the 'delicate regions' yet
Luigi MkII, my 'race bike' diamond frame but note it has a sloping top tube.. this sort of diamond frame may be easier for your wife to cope with.
And tell your good lady that it's not really a male thing this top tube on a bike frame.. the reason it's like that is it provides a more rigid structure, so the bike flexes less. And it's not really a female thing having a step-through frame. That's a fairly old-fashioned British approach going back to the days when we girlies didn't wear trousers as skirts & top tubes do pose problems
Pop over to Jonny Foreigner land across the channel & you'll see both genders on all sorts of bikes. Step through frames are useful if you have limited mobility/wear skirts, but it isn't purely a gender thing.
Whatever bike is decided upon there is one thing that is gender-related and she may have an issue with: saddle choice. Male & female anatomy is different (observant, aren't I) and most bikes that are not sold as 'women's bikes' come with a saddle designed for a man. On all my upright bikes, the first thing I did was to change the saddle for one designed for female anatomy and that fits my sit bones. Have a look around the forum and you'll see the issue of saddles come up a lot. Especially why a big soft squishy saddle does NOT equate to comfort.