Wasn't it ken that originally approved both the superhighways and cycle hire.
sort of. TfL were working on the cycle hire from about 2005, but the intention was that it cover the 32 boroughs, and Brent (I think) and one other Conservative borough were having none of it, so it got bogged down. The Cycling Superhighways were already planned by the time of the last election, although some, such as CS3 and CS8 have been messed about with since the election
Johnson claims to have spent £206M on cycling and who's to say he's wrong? My question is - does that represent a good deal for Londoners who don't cycle. I suspect that, while the Barclays Bikes may boost tourism, and the Superhighways have undoubtedly made a difference, I couldn't make the case that it has.