I like most of the stuff you post, both here and on youtube and think overall your contribution is positive.
But mebbe you should ask yourself if the edit was deliberate distortion to push the producers agenda or whether it was a fair reflection of the overall attitude you presented in the interview and elswhere.
Just picking on your Croydon Cyclist post 21 October. I understand the adrenaline driven expletive outburst, but 10 seconds later you pull up alongside and verbally tear the driver a new one before he has a chance to speak. Mebbe, the driver, like the motorcyclist in the full clip from the programme last night, would have been equally contrite had you first of all pointed out to him just how close and dangerous his pass had been. You seemed to assume his pass had been deliberate. If he had given you a mouthful then the moral high ground would have bee retained (along with further evidence) by simply telling him we was on video and would be reported to the police
I don't ride with a camera but have done as i suggest following close passes, often with positive results. One occasion a while a go in Teddington, I asked the guy to wind down his window (by gesture not rapping on it) and said I felt he had been too close, his response was that I had been a long way out from the parked cars, I told him that was to keep safe by avoiding the door zone the same way he drives some way out. His response was to apologise "I hadn't though of it that way"
In my experience, most conflict on the road arises from ignorance, misunderstanding and simple error. To think or speak in terms of "War" and "Us and Them" is counter productive to the objective of making the roads safer.