Miquel In De Rain
No Longer Posting
A flash from a taxi driver has got to be worth 1000 points.

The bolded bit is definitely not cyclecraft, rather the opposite. Cyclecraft is closer to the rest of your paragraph.![]()
except death and taxes, or if you are on a bike- death by taxisStrangly enough I have never read Cyclecraft or intend to. I think 30yrs on the motorcycle has given me good road sense adjusted for the bicycle, or I hope so. Nothing is guaranteed though......
Strangly enough I have never read Cyclecraft or intend to. I think 30yrs on the motorcycle has given me good road sense adjusted for the bicycle, or I hope so. Nothing is guaranteed though......
Strangly enough I have never read Cyclecraft or intend to. I think 30yrs on the motorcycle has given me good road sense adjusted for the bicycle, or I hope so. Nothing is guaranteed though......
"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know, but what we know for sure that just ain't so."“The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.”
I cannot work out the obsession some people have on this forum with Cyclecraft. Most people will not have heard of it at all and as far as I'm aware it has no standing in the law at all but is recommended reading for Bikability training. So IMHO quoting primary/secondary at a motorist is pointless. It should be in the Highway Code and I'm surprised it isn't, does anyone know if the government are being pressurised into including it and possibly including questions on a cyclists road positioning in the Theory Test all new drivers have to take?
In some cases the same thing can be said about discussing things with cyclists.2227934 said:This part is quite correct though, as a subset of the general rule that discussing anything with any motorist is sadly more likely to be pointless than useful.
Too right!
It's not illegal. It's perfectly acceptable for a cyclist to filter to the left of stationary traffic.The cyclist is illegally undertaking. You're supposed to go around them.
The areguement there would be that the buses can stop in it without blocking the flow of traffic. However, if there was a traffic jam, it would be illegal for the bus to drive down the lane passing the stuck cars, so the bus would end up blocking the bus lane.If undertaking were illegal, what would the point of bus lanes be?
I would say it's more to do with the rules which are applied to the motorways and when you are allowed to pass other vehicles on the left in those situations rather than about it being a solid line, as all that indicates is that it is a bus lane.The areguement there would be that the buses can stop in it without blocking the flow of traffic. However, if there was a traffic jam, it would be illegal for the bus to drive down the lane passing the stuck cars, so the bus would end up blocking the bus lane.
This is the reason it is not illegal to undertake (and I think that because a bus lane has a solid line, buses are allowed to undertake cars).