Would be interested to know what Paul says about his audax bike.GrahamG said:I reckon I'll be in the same boat as you - I've even got small hands so the smaller bars etc. on the WS bikes appealed too
I think I'm going to go for one of the Hewitt audax style frames though - got the fitting session on Saturday morning.
tundragumski said:It's interesting to hear about your problems - I have neck pain and it seems impossible to cure so I just live with it and limit my rides according to the pain (usually max of 75 miles) It's nice to think about long days in the saddle pain free like when we were younger but that's not reality for a lot of people as they get older and pick up injuries.
One thing I've noticed in these replies is that people talk about saddle height increases of cms! If you can increase your saddle by 2 or 3 cms and still ride the bike comfortably then it was far too low in the first place. I would say that the window of saddle height adjustment from min to max height is about 10mm (1 cm) for the correct riding height for distance road riding.
Plax said:Why not indeed. The female frames seem to be more compact as apparently we have shorter arms/torso and longer legs than our male counterparts. Unless it has a dropped top tube you can't really tell in passing that it's female specific, unless it's a girly colour. I've just given my female specific MTB to my sister, which looked exactly like a male bike apart from the colour was a bit turquoise and had a silly pattern. You could always paint it a more manly colour I suppose!
Plax said:Why not indeed. The female frames seem to be more compact as apparently we have shorter arms/torso and longer legs than our male counterparts. Unless it has a dropped top tube you can't really tell in passing that it's female specific, unless it's a girly colour. I've just given my female specific MTB to my sister, which looked exactly like a male bike apart from the colour was a bit turquoise and had a silly pattern. You could always paint it a more manly colour I suppose!
Fab Foodie said:The bit in bold is actually not true. Proportionally on average men and women are the same. The difference is that women are overall smaller.
IIRC Mike Burrows used the research that determined this when designing the Compact frames for Giant that originally only came in 3 sizes, S, M, L.
Dannyg said:Would be interested to know what Paul says about his audax bike.
He definitely steered me away from buying one. While this was primarily on the very good grounds that a tourer would give me more flexibility and could be set up with narrower rims, etc. for day rides/fast touring; I also got the impression that he felt more comfortable selling the touring frame. Possibly this was because he does not sell that many audax frames and felt that the touring frame was more of a tried and tested design.