Actually I read it very rarely these days, Nature is a much better publication. As for your fixation on my physics which you have now raised several times on different threads let me just say that while you may be reading the published papers on Opera I am talking to the guys that are doing the experiments and writing the papers. So my "slightly odd mainstream views about physics" are actually the outcome of talking to the people actually doing the mainstream physics. HTH & HAND
I'm not fixated, I just have (despite other failings) a better memory than many other of my detractors think I do and you didn't answer previously. I just find some of the things you post very odd that's all. We all do that sometimes - some stuff I post comes across odd sometimes as I don't have the time or more likely I've had to summarise it down which leads to complaints (but people complain an awful lot more if I write more).
As for knowing OPERA people, you sound like an upset postgrad physics student trying to drub up some story in a minor dispute within a department. BTDTGTTS
.
For something as the story we were talking about where pretty much anybody could understand it if they actually read a decent report/paper, I don't see the point recycling their views. Fair dos if it is something high level. Otherwise, wouldn't other people do it
. It's a bit like another bloke in another section of the forum who seems to have the same attitude. But if you can read Swedish extradition treaties, you most certainly can read that.