Drago
Legendary Member
- Location
- Suburban Poshshire
Strewth. Still, at least he doesn't have a downer on my Volvo's "Attila the Hun" wheel knives.
Last edited:
I've got a Volvo and a Mercedes!
I've got a Volvo and a Mercedes!
Other than driving it home after collecting it, Ive yet to actually drive the Volvo at all. The Smart hasn't moved in 27 days, so I'm practicing what I preach
Other than driving it home after collecting it, Ive yet to actually drive the Volvo at all. The Smart hasn't moved in 27 days, so I'm practicing what I preach
Indeed, a large proportion of cars with (those stupid) DRLs, don't appear to have the tail-lights on the same circuitDRL's are the biggest issue. Just because your bright LED DRL's are on, your rear light's arent. Flashed a guy on our road about 10 times in 200 yards, even switched my lights off and on. Oh, and his car has auto headlights - obviously switched 'off'.
Wifes Toyota CH-R has 'auto-on', but they must be fairly sensitive, as they turn on, even when reversing it into the garage, in daylightOh, and his car has auto headlights - obviously switched 'off'.
DRLs have a specific purpose, to allow other road users to see you. Try asking a truck driver who's looking in his mirrors in the rain and spray as you're passing him...DRLs make a heck of a difference in those situations if nothing else. Without them, you can appear almost invisible to them in rain and spray.
Statistics have shown that there is no improvement in accident rates attributable to DRLs outside of the sub-arctic northern european climate. Research has also shown that use of over-bright day time lighting in otherwise good viewing conditions can increase the chances of certain types of collision, such as T bones etc.
Its was one of those things foisted upon us by the EU (I'm not going there!) because its must surely be good for safety, despite the actual evidence in its favour being dubious.
It's like motorcycle leg protectors. The EU came that close to making them mandatory in the 80's, despite much evidence from the then TRRL showing that they actually tore riders in half at the hip in severe collisions. That only stalled when the unelected EU officer pushing the idea turned out to be doing it out of revenge - he'd found out his wife had been having an affair with a biker, when days later by pure chance this crossed his desk, and he pounced upon it as a chance to take his revenge against all biker kind. He came close to succeeding too.