You can divide 12 in more ways than you can divide 10 which makes the maths easier and more flexible.
In my centrifuge example it has 24 spaces and needs to be balanced symmetrically which I can do with 2,3,4,6,8,9,10,12,14, 15,16,18,20,21,22 or 24 samples. A 20 space rotor can be balanced only with an even number and that's only by virtue of them being divisible by two, not the graceful patterns I can make in a 24 space rotor.
A lot of labware, racks etc is organised in 12s or 24s. Lots of ways to group things.
I reckon if we were picking a new base to start again with, these days it would be 16.
A Spitfire pilot could fire his guns for only 16 seconds before running out of ammunition.
I reckon if we were picking a new base to start again with, these days it would be 16.
There would be a referendum. Two most popular results:
- Lucky seven!
- Basey McBaseface.
Yes & each of the 8 guns only had 300 rounds each, I was gobsmacked when I first heard this.
A counting system with a prime number as its base would be both awful and hilarious.
Well yes, and no ...Binary isn't my go-to when it comes to comedy but it seems to work for computers.
Binary isn't my go-to when it comes to comedy but it seems to work for computers.
Well yes, and no ...
Binary isn't my go-to when it comes to comedy but it seems to work for computers.
TBF I've also seen ternary counting systems somewhere.
It's daft for everyday use not because the low numbers, you can use multiples instead, but because you end up with long unwieldy strings of digits.
Presumably if a binary digit is a bit, then a ternary digit is a... tit?
I did some long range rifle shooting with 303 ammunition when I was a teenager, the same stuff that the Spitfire's eight machine guns had. The thought of 160 rounds a second from a Spitfire coming at you is pretty horrendous.