That Bit of CS2 is rubbish. If you want to turn right into Osborne street , to go onto Brick Lane then you are stuck in no mans land with the coaches coming down Whitechapel high street into the city inches away. You need to come out of the "protected " lane into main carriageway where you do get subjected to the bollox from drivers about get in your lane .
I try not to. However sometimes I just have to.It looks rubbish.I rarely use it now.
I try not to. However sometimes I just have to.
Really? The Advanced Stop Box looks like it's full-width there to help cyclists turn right once the lights change, but I don't know whether the oncoming traffic is held long enough for you to actually get going and across. It would have been nice if they'd moved the no-entry to White Church Lane back a bit to enable a jug-handle turn as another option but I know not everyone will use those.That Bit of CS2 is rubbish. If you want to turn right into Osborne street , to go onto Brick Lane then you are stuck in no mans land with the coaches coming down Whitechapel high street into the city inches away. You need to come out of the "protected " lane into main carriageway where you do get subjected to the bollox from drivers about get in your lane .
I think the bike effect is unlikely because London cycle hire users are all on similar bikes and IIRC women hirers are still disproportionately more injured. I also doubt the willingness to get away is a big thing, but maybe that's only my experience of London where there are soooo many lights and still everyone's so slow to move off - The rest? Maybe.One can speculate on the reasons; women being less risk averse and less willing to ride assertively or aggressively, less willing to get away at lights on the G of green ( if not before), more willing to abide by laws and road layouts that offer no protection and less willing or able to identify sources of danger. They ride bikes that are, in general, heavier and more cumbersome than the bikes than male riders generally use.
Should be, but blatently isn't. If it were for cycle routes, that would be a big step forwards.Sustrans used to have a suggestion that their routes would be "safe" for a competent 10 year old (or similar)
That should be the aim or any road
Isn't it still even more disproportionate than for any recent baseline case, though?Hmm, I can't help read his thread with a little...well, put it this way: Men have been injuring and killing women disproportionately for thousands of years, the fact that they are doing it with cars and trucks while women are on bicycles strikes me as less significant than the underlying theme simply being continued.