<Tommy>
Illegitimi non carborundum
- Location
- Camden, London
It is a way of ranking racers - I think based on the way USA Cycling do it. If you go into Rankings tab on ZP and then FAQ it gives the detailed explanation. Here is the first para..
"USAC Points calculation
Note: A small field adjustment has been applied to the following rules. If there are between 5 and 9 riders we use the top 5 for quality and all riders for average.
A riders ranking going into every race is calculated from the average of their 5 best results in the past 3 months.
Rankings are set between 0 and 600 points. Fewer points means you have a better ranking. So the goal is to earn the fewest points possible.
In general USAC summarizes the ranking system as follows; “to improve ranking, a rider must beat riders who are currently ranked stronger.” This is a true statement but has some nuances, which we will discuss below.
The points system has 3 critical calculations: Race Quality, Points per Place, and Ranking Points."
If you race regularly, it is a good measure of how you are progressing. It is also useful to see how other riders in your race are likely to do. If you look to the right of the results screens for races, it tells you if you have improved or not.
I think my ranking flatters me because I went through a period of doing races that suited me. I think it also favours people who race more frequently than those who don’t. I’ve no issue with either of those things. I think It’s a fair enough system really. But it can skewer the rankings a bit.
I has conversations with a couple of the guys on zsunr nad they suggested using zp live in races to gage people’s strengths and use it to decide how to approach the lead in the the finish. I’ve tried it but I think it might information overload for me personally. Has anyone else tried that and got it to work for them?