[QUOTE 4237189, member: 9609"]they should be in Iceland now, was it under-weight? lead poisoning is a big problem with Whoopers, they mistake lead shot for grit and it kills them, one of the signs is not being able to migrate through loss of condition.
I believe lead shot is banned for waterfowling now, although I do also hear that some still persist with it, some say it is far superior?, may be it should be completely banned - would a complete ban on all lead shot make much of a difference ? (i'm not trying to get into another argument, it is a genuine question)[/QUOTE]
Having read up on Whoopers I'm now wondering whether he was mistaken, or referring to a previous sighting. He also told me he originally mistook then stonechats for sparrows. He may just have appaling eyesight or be colour blind!
Lead shot? Thorny issue. I haven't shot waterfowl since the ban. Steel shot is inefficient enough to be inhumane IMO and tungsten matrix is eyewatering expensive. Although I like eating Mallard and half-ducks, I don't value them enough to justify the extra cost of the shells, and none of the shoots I have been a member of have had duck to shoot anyway.
I'm sure there will be some unscrupulous shooters who continue to use lead over wetland, but I don't know any. The ban is not all that well thought out if you ask me. In a ruthlessly logical way, if there is a proven link between poisoned dabbling waterfowl and lead shot, then it stands to reason that shooters should not use lead shot over wetland or water. The ban should concentrate on that aspect. The jury is out on the level of damage caused, and I haven't read anything that conviñces me either way....the level of poisoning is disputed by some in the sport. To that end I would support the ban until it's proven unnecessary.
However, progress that argument to a duck lifting from a ditch on a pheasant shoot. If the duck is hit and killed, does it matter in any way at all what the cartridge contains? Dead from lead is just as dead as were it to be shot with tungsten. A shooter killing a duck in these circumstances with lead shot would be breaking the law, despite the fact that a second ago a shot was taken with lead at a pheasant flying over exactly the same piece of land.
A complete ban on lead would have very, very far reaching consequences for the approx 2 million shooters in the UK. Until it is proven beyond all reasonable doubt that lead poses a real (not just surmised) significant threat to wildlife, the cost to the economy would be enormous. All but the wealthy elite would be forced out of the sport, and that would mean a reversal of all the good that the current shooting fraternity bring through conservation and habitat management.