But was anyone DQed for equipment violations at the Worlds
Some kid got DQed for using a 53 instead of a 52 chainring, IIRC.
Stephen Roche, who is a bit of a tit, was one of the chief advocates of the sock length rule.
But was anyone DQed for equipment violations at the Worlds
Some kid got DQed for using a 53 instead of a 52 chainring, IIRC.
Stephen Roche, who is a bit of a tit, was one of the chief advocates of the sock length rule.
He would probably have been DQ'd if he'd carried on and used the offending equipment. I wonder if anyone suggested that Annemiek borrow someone else's socks.There was a kid who wasn't allowed to use his normal bike with the 53 - he had to borrow a bike. But he wasn't DQ'd.
He would probably have been DQ'd if he'd carried on and used the offending equipment. I wonder if anyone suggested that Annemiek borrow someone else's socks.
Seems the sole purpose of the sock rule is to generate jokes and merriment.
If the athletes feel like ignoring it, as AVV did, then they happily do so. It's irrelevant to them.
He would probably have been DQ'd if he'd carried on and used the offending equipment. I wonder if anyone suggested that Annemiek borrow someone else's socks.
I'm imagining Van Vleuten turning up at the start line with a pair of mismatched scratchy woolen socks round her ankles, looking embarassed.
Phew....bet he's relieved ! He can now race The Tour Down Under 😁MvP Now cleared on appeal.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cycling/63968918
Not exactly. The conviction was quashed but he had pled guilty and so was sentenced to a year's conditional release instead. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-13/van-der-poel-assault-convictions-quashed-on-appeal/101765700MvP Now cleared on appeal.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cycling/63968918